TURKIC LANGUAGES OF PERSIA: AN OVERVIEW

Only in few other regions (Caucasus and Southern Siberia) one can find a nearly comparable diversity of Turkic languages as in Persia. The number of their speakers varies from several thousands to several millions.

 

TURKIC LANGUAGES OF PERSIA: AN OVERVIEW

Only in few other regions (Caucasus and Southern Siberia) one can find a nearly comparable diversity of Turkic languages as in Persia. The number of their speakers varies from several thousands (e. g., Khalaj, which had only some ten thousands of speakers in the middle of 1990s; cf. Doerfer, 1997, p. 52) to several millions (e. g., Azerbaijani). Altogether, one-sixth of today’s Iranian population is turcophone or bilingual (Persian and Turkic; see Doerfer, 1969, p. 13). The languages they speak belong to different branches of the Turkic language family; most of them (besides such important exceptions as Khalaj) are from the Oghuz branch of Turkic languages. The state of our knowledge of these languages and their dialects is very different. Some of them, like Azerbaijani and Khalaj, have been widely and intensively investigated, while some other—like Berberi in northeastern Iran, which may not even be a Turkic language (Doerfer, 1969, pp. 15-16)—are only the subject of rumors. Hereinafter, the languages and dialects are grouped according to the different branches of the Turkic language family.

1. Oghuz.

1.1. Central-Oghuz.

1.1.1. Azerbaijani (to be more specific, Southern Azerbaijani dialects). The Azerbaijani language of Persia is spread in the northwest of the country with the “center” in Tabriz and is spoken by several millions of people. In comparison to the language of the Republic of Azerbaijan, the Azerbaijani language of Persia is less investigated. In 1970, there were 1,442 works dealing with the Azerbaijani of the Soviet Union, but only 18 studies on the Azerbaijani of Persia (Doerfer, 1983, p. 99, n. 2). Yet, contrary to other Turkic languages of Persia, the Azerbaijani has, for a long time, been relatively well known and treated. Published works deal with lexicon, morphology, syntax, etc., but mainly focus on materials from Tabriz, because those were available without any difficulties. The founder of Iranian-Azerbaijani studies was Karl Foy (1856-1907), who wrote the first extensive work on the subject in the beginning of the 20th century (Foy, 1903-04). For the later period, works of H. S. Szapszał (1873-1961), Hellmut Ritter (1892-1971), Vincent Monteil, and Xavier de Planhol have to be mentioned (Szapszał, 1935; Ritter, 1921 and 1939; Monteil, 1956; Planhol, 1961). In addition, works dealing with the Azerbaijani of Persia were published in the Soviet Union (and later in independent Russia and Azerbaijan) as well (Hüsejnov, 1958; Rähimov, 1965; Rüstämov, 1965; Širälijev, 1962; Idem, 1965). One of the most extensive works in which Iranian-Azerbaijani materials are presented is Householder and Lotfi’s Basic Course in Azerbaijani published in 1965.

1.1.2. The dialect of Galūgāh (the eastern part of the southern Caspian shore), which was occasionally called “the easternmost known point of the Azerbaijani language-area” (Doerfer, Hesche, and Ravanyar, p. vii; cf. Doerfer, 1974, p. 199). The dialect of Galūgāh belongs to the Central-Oghuz branch and is very close to the Azerbaijani dialects of Persia. On the other hand, it shows a number of differences from them (Doerfer, Hesche, and Ravanyar, p. vii). Detailed investigations of this dialect were not available before the third Turcological expedition to Persia in 1973 initiated by Gerhard Doerfer.

1.1.3. Salčuk. The Salčuk was first mentioned by Karl Heinrich Menges (1908-99) who reported that it was spoken in the south and southwest of Kermān (Menges, 1951, p. 279). More detailed information was not provided by Menges, because he had no opportunity to visit that area and to study the language (Doerfer, 1970, p. 219).

1.2. Northern-Oghuz

1.2.1. Ḵorāsāni (Khorasani Turkish). Khorasani Turkish is spoken by more than one million people in the northeast of Persia (in the province of Khorasan) and in the neighboring regions of Turkmenistan up to beyond the Amu Darya River (Doerfer and Hesche, 1993, pp. 7, 14). Between both regions are located the language and settlement areas of the Turkmens (Sarıq- and Arsarı-Turkmens). Wladimir Ivanow (1886-1970) had recognized already in 1926 that the Khorasani Turkish has to be seen as an idiom different from both the Azerbaijani and the Turkmen languages (Ivanow, p. 154), but its independence was identified later. In 1936 Aleksandr Potseluevskiĭ (1894-1948) regarded it as an independent branch of the Turkmen language (cf. Doerfer, 1977, pp 129-30). Earlier, Alexander Chodzko (1804-1891) had interpreted Khorasani Turkish as the Turkmen language (Chodzko, 1842, pp. 479-80), while Karl Heinrich Menges first described it as “Turkmen” (Menges, 1939, pp. 9-34) and later as “Azerbaijani” (dialect of Qučān; see Menges, 1951, pp. 275-76). The last assumption was not quite wrong. Indeed, Khorasani Turkish (that is, Northeastern Oghuz) represents a transitional form from Central Oghuz (Azerbaijani) to Northwestern Oghuz (Turkmen), but it is closer to Azerbaijani than to Turkmen. Khorasani Turkish can be divided—depending on the respective definition—into two (Northern and Southern) or four (Northwestern, Northeastern, Central, and Southern) dialects (Doerfer and Hesche, 1993, p. 16). A more detailed knowledge of the Khorasani Turkish was gained in the course of the Turcological expeditions to Persia undertaken by the Department of Turcology and Altaic Studies of the University of Göttingen. These endeavors have led to numerous publications by Doerfer and Hesche about the Khorasani Turkish (Doerfer, 1972, 1977, 1987, 1992, and 1998; Doerfer and Hesche, 1993 and 1998).

1.3. Northwestern Oghuz

1.3.1. Turkmen. The Turkmen language of Persia is spoken in the northeast of the country (in the province of Khorasan); its area is adjacent to that of the Khorasani Turkish, and the language areas partly overlap each other. Spoken by approximately 400,000 people, the Turkmen language has the second largest number of speakers after the Azerbaijani among all Turkic languages of Persia. Doerfer’s presumption (1978, p. 133) that “the Turkmen language is not (and if it is, then sporadically) spoken in the entire Khorasan (except in Astarābād)” was not quite correct, since both languages (Persian and Turkmen) exist here side by side. The Turkmen language of Persia is divided in several dialects, which do not differ much from each other but still possess their specific characteristics. Contrary to the Turkmen language of Turkmenistan, the Turkmen language of Persia is less studied, being neither dealt with nor mentioned in numerous descriptions of the Turkmen language (e.g., Bazin, 1959; Benzing, 1939). Menges mentioned the Turkmens of Persia, but he gave no description of their language (Menges, 1951, p. 278). The first extensive account was presented in 1966 by Yusuf Azmun (Azmun, 1966). Later, Gerhard Doerfer and Wolfram Hesche followed Azmun’s description (Doerfer and Hesche, 1998). Among the Oghuz languages, Turkmen shows the most archaic features, such as the preservation of the length of vowels. The above-mentioned Khorasani Turkish has to be distinguished from the Turkmen language and must not be considered a branch of Turkmen.

1.4. Southern-Oghuz.

1.4.1. Afšār. The Afšār language was once spoken in a wide area in western and southwestern Persia from Kermānšāh to the shores of the Persian Gulf. In Europe, the Afšārs became known due to the Afsharid dynasty (see AFSHARIDS) that ruled in Persia in 1736-96 (about the Southern-Oghuz languages see Doerfer and Hesche, 1989; for Afšār-u-Tēpa, which is the Afšār language of the village of Tēpa, see Ligeti, 1957; for Kābul-Afšār see Abbasov, 1975; Doerfer, 1983 and 1985; and Doerfer and Hesche, 1989). The Afšār language, and especially its variety of Kabul, shows some interesting features, like the “archaic” h- (Doerfer, 1985, pp. 168-74).

1.4.2. and 1.4.3. Qašqāʾi and Äynallu. These are spoken in the region of Hamadan and in the province of Fars, especially to the north of Shiraz. The relationship between Qašqāʾi and Äynallu is still controversial. Tadeusz Kowalski (1889-1948), Annemarie von Gabain (1901-93), and Gerhard Doerfer defined them as dialects close to Azerbaijani (Kowalski, p. 4; von Gabain, p. 174; Doerfer, 1969, p. 14), while Karl Heinrich Menges considered them to be closer to the Ottoman Turkish than to the Azerbaijani and assumed that they formed the third group of dialects of Southwestern Turkish (Menges, 1951, p. 278). Ahmet Caferoğlu (1899-1975) and Gerhard Doerfer, referring especially to the deviations from Azerbaijani, refused Menges’ assumption about the closeness of Qašqāʾi and Äynallu to the Ottoman Turkish (Caferoğlu and Doerfer, p. 281). Menges regarded Äynallu only as a sub-dialect of Qašqāʾi (cf. Caferoğlu and Doerfer, p. 281). From his point of view, Äynallu—as well as Sonqori (see 1.4.4. below)—represents a transitional form between the Azerbaijani and the Khorasani Turkish (Menges, 1951, pp. 273-79; cf. Doerfer, 1977, p. 54). Doerfer regarded the dialects to the north of “Khalajestan” (see KHALAJ, and no. 2. lower in this study), Pugerd, and Āštiān to be close to Qašqāʾi and Äynallu. According to him, both Qašqāʾi and Äynallu show closeness to the dialects of Qazvin, north of Tehran, Solaymānābād, and south of Hamadan (Doerfer, 1998, p. 274). Qašqāʾi and Äynallu reveal numerous characteristics which allow to relate them to the Southern-Oghuz group (Doerfer and Hesche, 1989, the list between maps 5.5 and 5.6).

Until the middle of the 20th century, Qašqāʾi and Äynallu had not been investigated. Aleksandr Romaskevich (1885-1942) and Sir Aurel Stein (1862-1943) were the first who collected materials on these dialects. Their materials were later published in the work of Tadeusz Kowalski (1936), which was the most detailed description of Qašqāʾi and Äynallu for that time. Later, researchers like Oliver Garrod, Karl Heinrich Menges, and Marie Thèrése Ullens de Schooten collected materials but never published them. The materials collected by Menges (recorded in Samirom) were very different from those compiled by Tadeusz Kowalski (cf. Caferoğlu and Doerfer, p. 286). Later studies on the Southwestern dialects of Turkish (von Gabain) dealt with Qašqāʾi only marginally. Further materials were collected by Wolfram Hesche, Hartwig Scheinhardt, and Semih Tezcan in Firuzābād during the Turcological expeditions to Persia in 1968, 1969, and 1973. Qašqāʾi materials were finally published in 1990 in the volume entitled Oghusica aus Iran (Doerfer, Hesche, and Ravanyar); they also include three texts from the collection of K. H. Menges. Since early 21st century, Éva Á. Csató has been specially working on the Qašqāʾi language (Csató, 2001 and 2005).

1.4.4. Sonqori. Next to Qašqāʾi and Äynallu, Sonqori is worth mentioning as another dialect of the Southern-Oghuz group. It is spoken in Sonqor (Sunqur), east of Kermānšāh (Doerfer, 1977). Sonqor (ca. 35,000 inhabitants) is located in a large valley separated from the rest of Kurdistan. There are two villages (Qalʿa-ye Farhād Khan, 2 km north of Sonqor, 200 inhabitants; and Qorva, 5 km southwest of Sonqor, 400 inhabitants) in its neighborhood, in which the spoken dialects differ from the Sonqori insignificantly. In the case of Sonqori, we had had a scanty knowledge before the Turcological expeditions undertaken by the Department of Turcology and Altaic Studies of the University of Göttingen. Sonqori was investigated in the course of the third expedition of 1973 (Doerfer, 1981, p. 70). K. H. Menges had already characterized it—together with the Qašqāʾi and Äynallu—as a transitional form from the Azerbaijani to the Khorasani Turkish (cf. Doerfer, 1977, p. 54).

2. Khalaj

The Khalaj language area, located approximately 250 km southwest of Tehran, comprised 47 villages in the 1960s and 1970s. The number of speakers in that time was not more than 20,000. In the middle of 1990s, G. Doerfer assumed a wide Persianization of this group, and such process had already been recognized three decades earlier (Doerfer, 1997, p. 52).

The first information concerning the Khalaj language was given by Vladimir Minorsky (1877-1966), who published some “Khalaj” texts, but only one of them was really a sample of Khalaj (Minorsky, 1940-42). In addition, Minorsky did not recognize that Khalaj is an independent Turkic language or, to be more specific, a language group. Following Minorsky, Moḥammad Moqaddam (1950) provided some further data about the Khalaj language. After that, Khalaj was not treated until its “rediscovery” by G. Doerfer in the course of the expeditions to Persia in 1968, 1969, and 1973. As a result of extensive research, a grammar (Doerfer, 1988) and a dictionary (Doerfer and Tezcan, 1980) have been worked out for Khalaj.

Another result of the Turcological expeditions initiated by G. Doerfer was the conclusion that Khalaj, which is divided into several dialects, forms an independent group of languages within the Turkic language family. Even though the dialectal differences are not considerable, altogether they show remarkable and wide diversion. Furthermore, this language shows numerous archaisms that can be found either in Old Turkic, or in more distant Turkic languages, such as Yakut or Chuvash (cf. Doerfer, 1989, p. 108-12).

In addition, there are some other idioms about which—as it has been pointed out above—very little is known (in some cases, even the self-denomination of their speakers is obscure). Menges reported about the existence of turcophone groups in Baluchistan and Mekran in southeastern Persia (Menges, 1951, p. 279). However, he neither wrote anything about their languages and dialects nor gave their exact self-denominations. Also, it appears that Doerfer did not agree with Menges’ assumption (Doerfer, 1970, p. 219). Another group, which had settled to the south of Tehran and which reportedly speaks Chaghatay (Eastern Turkish; see CHAGHATAY LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE), was mentioned in a letter to G. Doerfer by László Szimonisz, who stayed in that region in 1965. By the same occasion, speakers of a language of the Kipchak/Qipchaq (Qepčāq) group are also referred to in the same area (Doerfer, 1969, p. 15). Yet, these groups have not been named by their respective ethnonyms either. Another group of people, about whose language and identity nearly nothing is known, includes the speakers of the above-mentioned unknown language called “Berberi,” which is reportedly spoken in few villages in Khorasan (Doerfer, 1969, pp. 15-16).

 

Bibliography:

A. M. Abbasov, “Nekotorye zametki ob afsharakh Afganistana” (Some notes on the Afshars of Afghanistan), Sovetskaya Tyurkologiya 1975/4, pp. 72-81.

Yu. Azmun, “Türkmen halk edebiyatı hakkında,” in Reşid Rahmeti Arat için, Ankara 1966, pp. 32-83.

V. V. Barthold, Histoire des Turcs d’Asie Centrale, Paris 1945.

L. Bazin, “Le Turkmène,” Philologiae Turcicae Fundamenta 1, 1959, pp. 308-17.

L. Beck, The Qashqa’i People of Southern Iran, Los Angeles, 1981.

Idem, The Qashqa’i of Iran, New Haven, 1986.

J. Benzing, “Über die Verformen im Turkmenischen,” Mitteilungen des Seminars für Orientalischen Sprachen, Westasiatische Studien 42/2, 1939, pp. 1-56.

C. E. Bosworth and G. Clauson, “Al-Xwārazmī on the Peoples of Central Asia,” JRAS, 1965, pp. 2-12.

A. Caferoğlu and G. Doerfer, “Das Aserbaidschanische,” Philologiae Turcicae Fundamenta 1, 1959, pp. 280-307.

A. Chodzko, Specimens of the Popular Poetry of Persia, London, 1842.

É. Á. Csató, “Present in Kashkay,” Turkic Languages 5, 2001, pp. 104-9.

Idem, “On Copying in Kashkay,” in Linguistic Convergence and Areal Diffusion. Case Studies from Iranian, Semitic and Turkic, ed. É. Á. Csató, B. Isaksson, and C. Jahani, London, 2005, pp. 271-83.

Idem, “Gunnar Jarring’s Kashkay Materials,” in Turkic-Iranian Contiguity, ed. L. Johanson, C. Bulut, and F. Kıral, Wiesbaden, forthcoming.

G. Doerfer, “Die Turksprachen Irans,” Türk Dili Araştırmaları Yıllığı, Belleten, 1969, pp. 13-23.

Idem, “Irano-Altaistica (Turkish and Mongolian Languages of Persia and Afghanistan),” Current Trends in Linguistics, VI: Linguistics in South West Asia and North Africa, The Hague, 1970, pp. 217-34.

Idem, “Zum Vokabular eines aserbaidschanischen Dialekts in Zentralpersien,” in Voprosy tyurkologii. K shestidesyatiletiyu akademika AN Azerb.SSR. M. S. Shiralieva, Baku, 1971, pp. 33-62.

Idem, “Horasan Türkçesi,” in Türk lehçeleri örnekleri II (yaşayan Türk lehçe ve ağızları), ed. S. Çağatay, Ankara, 1972, pp. 261-64.

Idem, “Bericht über eine linguistische Forschungsreise in Iran,” Türk Dili Araştırmaları Yıllığı, Belleten 1973-1974, 1974, pp. 199-202.

Idem, “Das Sonqor-Türkische (Ein vorläufiger Bericht),” Stud. Or. 47, 1977, pp. 43-55.

Idem, “Das Chorasantürkische,” Türk Dili Araştırmaları Yıllığı, Belleten 1977, 1978, pp. 127-204.

Idem, “Turkish and Mongolian Investigations in Iran and Afghanistan, Undertaken by the University of Göttingen,” The Bulletin of the International Institute for Linguistic Sciences 2 (1), Kyoto, 1981, pp. 54-71.

Idem, “Ein türkischer Dialekt aus der Gegend von Hamadān,” Acta Orientalia (Academiae Scientarium Hungaricae) 36/1-3, 1983, pp. 99-124.

Idem, “Kabulafscharisch und Chaladsch,” Central Asiatic Journal 29, 1985, pp. 166-75.

Idem, Grammatik des Chaladsch, Wiesbaden, 1988.

Idem, “Die Kopula im Chaladsch,” in Gedanke und Wirkung. Festschrift zum 90. Geburtstag von Nikolaus Poppe, ed. W. Heissig and K. Sagaster, Wiesbaden, 1989, pp. 106-12.

Idem, “Chorasantürkisch aus dem ‘Türkenkessel’,” Central Asiatic Journal 36, 1992, pp. 44-71.

 

Idem, “Sprichwörter aus Nordchorasan,” Materialia Turcica 17, 1996, pp. 1-14.

 

Idem, “Türkische Sprachen und Dialekte in Iran,” WZKM 87, 1997, pp. 42-63.

Idem, “Turkic Languages of Iran,” in The Turkic Languages, ed. L. Johanson and É. Á. Csató, London and New York, 1998, pp. 273-82.

Idem, “The Suffix of the Third Person Plural of the Verb in Khorasan Turkic,” Studia Turcologica Cracoviensia 5, 1998, pp. 111-17.

G. Doerfer and W. Hesche, Südoghusische Materialien aus Afghanistan und Iran, Wiesbaden, 1989.

Idem, Chorasantürkisch. Wörterlisten—Kurzgrammatiken—Indices, Wiesbaden, 1993.

Idem, Türkische Folklore-Texte aus Chorasan, Wiesbaden, 1998.

Idem, “Turkmenische Materialien aus Gonbad-e Qābūs,” Materialia Turcica 19, 1998, pp. 77-125.

G. Doerfer, W. Hesche, and J. Ravanyar, Oghusica aus Iran, Wiesbaden, 1990.

G. Doerfer, W. Hesche, H. Scheinhardt, and S. Tezcan, Khalaj Materials, Bloomington, Ind., 1971.

G. Doerfer and S. Tezcan, Wörterbuch des Chaladsch. Dialekt von Charrāb, Budapest, 1980.

Idem, Folklore-Texte der Chaladsch, Wiesbaden, 1994.

K. Foy, “Azerbajğanische Studien mit einer Charakteristik des Südtürkischen,” Mitteilungen des Seminars für Orientalische Sprachen, Westasiatische Studien 6, 1903, pp. 126-93; and 7, 1904, pp. 197-265.

A. von Gabain, “Die Südwestdialekte des Türkischen,” HO I/5/1, Leiden and Köln, 1963, pp. 175-204.

O. Garrod, “The Qashqai Tribe of Fars,” JRAS 33, 1946, pp. 293-306.

F. W. Householder, Jr. and M. Lotfi, Basic Course in Azerbaijani, Bloomington and The Hague, 1965.

A. Hüsejnov, Azärbajan dialektologijasy, Baku, 1958.

W. Ivanow, “Notes on the Ethnology of Khorasan,” Geographical Journal 67, 1926, pp. 143-58.

T. Kowalski, Sir Aurel Steins Sprachaufzeichnungen im Äinallu-Dialekt aus Südpersien. Zapiski Sir Aurela Steina w dialekcie Äinallu z południowej Persij, Krakow, 1937.

L. Ligeti, “Sur la langue des Afchars d’Afghanistan,” Acta Orientalia (Academiae Scientarium Hungricae) 7, 1957, pp. 109-56.

K. H. Menges, “Einige Bemerkungen zur Vergleichenden Grammatik des Turkmenischen,” Acta Orientalia 11, 1939, pp. 7-34.

Idem, “Research in the Turkic Dialects of Iran (Preliminary Report on a Trip to Persia),” Oriens 4, 1951, pp. 273-79.

V. Minorsky, “The Turkish Dialect of Khalaj,” BSOS 10, 1940-42, pp. 417-37.

Idem, “Äinałłu/ Inałłu,” RO 17, 1953, pp. 1-11.

ʿAziz Moḥseni, “Qašqā’īlär haqqïnda bir nečä söz,” Varliq, Persian and Turkish Journal 72, April-May 1989, pp. 72-74.

Moḥammad Moqadddam, “Guyešhā-ye Vafs wa Āštiān wa Tafreš,” Irān-ḵoda 11, 1318 Š./1939, pp. 1-184.

V. Monteil, “Sur le dialecte turc de l’Azerbâydjân Iranien,” JA 244, 1956, pp. 1-77.

P. Oberling, The Turkic Peoples of Southern Iran, Cleveland, Ohio, 1964.

Idem, The Qashqā’i Nomads of Fārs, The Hague and Paris, 1974.

X. de Planhol, “Contributions à la dialectologie rurale de l’Azeri (Notes lexicographiques par Louis Bazin),” JA 249, 1961, pp. 411-25.

A. P. Potseluevskiĭ, Dialekty turkmenskogo yazyka (Dialects of the Turkmen language), Ashkhabad, 1936.

M. Rähimov, Azärbajğan dilindä fe’l šäkillärinin formalašmasy tarixi, Baku, 1965.

H. Ritter, “Aserbaidschanische Texte zur nordpersischen Dialektkunde,” Der Islam 11, 1921, pp. 181-212.

A. A. Romaskevich, “Pesni kashkaĭtsev” (Songs of the Qashqai’s), in Sbornik Muzeya antropologii i ètnografii imeni Petra Velikogo pri Akademii Nauk SSSR 5, Leningrad, 1925, pp. 573-610.

R. Rüstämov, Azärbajğan dili dialekt vä šivälärindä fe’l, Baku, 1965.

M. Š. Širälijev, Azärbajğan dialektologijasynyn äsaslary, Baku, 1962.

Idem, “The Forms of the Present Tense in the Azerbaijanian Dialects,” Ural-altaische Jahrbücher 36, 1965, pp. 413-15.

H. S. Szapszał, Próby literatury ludowej Turków Azerbajdżanu perskiego (Samples of folk literature of the Turks from Iranian Azerbaijan), Krakow, 1935.

M. Th. Ullens de Schooten, “Among the Kashkai. A Tribal Migration in Persia,” Geographical Magazine 27, London, 1954, pp. 68-78.

(Michael Knüppel)

Last Updated: April 15, 2010