MESKAVAYH, ABU ʿALI AḤMAD b. Moḥammad [ebn], Persian chancery official and treasury clerk of the Buyid period, boon companion, litterateur and accomplished writer in Arabic on a variety of topics, including history, theology, philosophy and medicine (d. 421/1030). His name appears variously in the sources as “Ebn Meskavayh” and “Meskavayh,” with the former form more probably correct. Although Yāqut, who calls him “Meskavayh,” states that he was a convert from Zoroastrianism (II, p. 91), it is more likely that one of his ancestors bore the name “Meskavayh” and converted to Islam before him. At any event, Ebn Meskavayh does not come across at all as a religious zealot in his works, and this was possibly due to the influence of his Magian background on his intellectual formation. Very little is known about his early life. According to the Persian biographer of Shiʿite ulama, Moḥammad-Bāqer Ḵʷānsāri (pp. 70-71), he was born at Ray, and it would seem very likely that he grew up in the province of Jebāl. He must have received training as a kāteb, or secretary,before 340/952, around which time he served as a secretary and boon companion (nadim) to Abu Moḥammad Ḥasan Mohallabi (d. 352/963), the vizier of the Buyid amir Moʿezz-al-Dawla. He lived mainly in Baghdad and thus enjoyed a wealth of amenities and contacts in what was still the cultural, if not the political, hub of the central and eastern Islamic world. After serving Mohallabi for twelve years he then spent seven years with another major Buyid vizier, Ebn al-ʿAmid (q.v.; d. 360/971) at the court of Rokn-al-Dawla in Ray. He apparently served both as librarian and keeper of the state papers and archives in the official chancery (the sources usually call him al-Ḵāzen, “custodian, keeper,” as in Yāqut, II, pp. 88, 95; Ebn al-Qefti, Taʾriḵ al-ḥokamāʾ, p. 331; Tawḥidi, p. 346), and also as tutor to the vizier’s son, Abu’l-Fatḥ. Ebn Meskavayh himself praises the richness of Ebn al-ʿAmid’s library, and he personally saved it from destruction in 355/966, when a band of religious warriors from Khorasan passed through Ray on their way to the Byzantine wars; the library amounted to 100 camel’s loads, according to his explicit statement (Margoliouth and Amedroz, Eclipse II, p. 224; V, p. 237).

After Ebn al-ʿAmid’s death, Ebn Meskavayh probably continued in the service of his son Abu’l-Fatḥ; in 364/975 he came to Baghdad with Abu’l-Fatḥ and a Buyid army. He rejected an opportunity to serve under the Ṣāḥeb Esmāʿil b. ʿAbbād at Isfahan under Moʾayyed-al-Dawla, since he considered himself at least the equal of the Ṣāḥeb; but soon after 367/978 he entered the service of ʿAżod-al-Dawla (q.v.; d. 372/982) at his court in Shiraz. He must have been already well-acquainted with the emir, since Ebn al-ʿAmid had in the past been his tutor, but now for the first time he found himself directly in his service. He seems to have served as a ḵāzen in the sense of “financial official;” certainly, he always expresses a keen interest in financial matters in his Tajāreb al-omam, making this history a valuable contemporary source on taxation policy and the spread of the eqṭāʿ (q.v.), or land-grant system, in Iraq and western Persia. After ʿAżod-al-Dawla’s death, Ebn Meskavayh probably served under his son Ṣamṣām-al-Dawla (d. 388/998) in Ray, since he is mentioned as one of the boon companions of Ṣamṣām-al-Dawla’s vizier, Ebn Saʿdān. Certain sources (e.g. Yāqut, II, p. 90) mention further that he served Bahāʾ-al-Dawla (d. 403/1012; see BUYIDS), Ṣamṣām-al-Dawla’s brother and rival in Fārs, though this is not known for certain.

The details of Ebn Meskavayh’s life are obscure in the period starting from Ebn Saʿdān’s execution in 375/985 until his own death at an advanced age on Ṣafar 421/ February 1030 (according to Ḵʷānsāri again, loc. cit.) at Isfahan, then under Kakuid rule. Some vague references in the sources connect him with Ḵʷārazm and its shahs (presumably the Maʾmunids of Gorgānj, 385-408/995-1017, who were the patrons of such eminent scholars of the time as Ebn Sinā and Biruni, qq.v.), but there is no solid evidence for this, and it is remarkable that Ṯaʿālebi, for instance, should not mention his presence there. Ebn Meskavayh had extended his history, the Tajāreb al-omam, up to the year 369/979-80, working on its completion until 372/982-83, but nothing is known for certain about his life after his associations with Ebn Saʿdān and Abu Ḥayyān Tawḥidi. Yāqut (II, pp. 95-96) cites a spiritual testament (waṣiya) of his, but he is probably quoting here from Abu Ḥayyān.

Ebn Meskavayh was a prominent figure in the intellectual and cultural life of his time. He engaged in correspondence with figures like Abu Ḥayyān and Badiʿ-al-Zamān Hamaḏāni (qq.v.). He was, it seems, an accomplished writer in the styleof badiʿ (q.v.; rhetorical embellishment) and a fluent poet; examples of his verse are quoted by Ṯaʿālebi in his biographical notice on him (I, pp. 96-100). Ebn Meskavayh was also fascinated by alchemy, including the transmutation of base metals, and by the occult sciences. His general attitude towards Islam seems to have been a mild one; he displays a philosophical and somewhat rationalist approach to religion characteristic of certain circles of his time, such as that of the Eḵwān al-Ṣafāʾ (q.v.; Brethren of Purity) of Baṣra. Another of his interests was medicine, a science much encouraged by his master ʿAżod-al-Dawla; it may well have been for the Buyid amir that he wrote his two works on pharmacology, which are listed by Ebn al-Qefṭi (p. 331) but are not otherwise known.

The sources list some nine works by Ebn Meskavayh, including two works on theology and an anthology of poetry. But it was firstly as an historian, and secondly as a writer on philosophy and ethics, that his lasting reputation as an author of major importance was established. His Tajāreb al-omam wa taʿāqeb (or ʿawāqeb) al-hemam (“Experiences of the nations and consequences of high ambitions”) is an outstanding piece of work. In form a general history extending as far as the death of ʿAżod-al-Dawla in 372/982, it is remarkable for its secular and philosophical attitude to events. For the period until the early 4th/10th century, he offers an abridgement of Ṭabari’s chronicle, dispensing with the annalistic division of the early Islamic period and concentrating on the essentials. From the point where Ṭabari’s chronicle comes to an end (302/915) up to the point where his contemporary history begins, Ebn Meskavayh’s chief source is the largely lost history of Ṯābet b. Senān of the famous family of Sabians from Ḥarrān. Thereafter he relies on eyewitness reports from contemporaries, such as Mohallabi, Ebn al-ʿAmid, and other secretaries of the Buyids. In his history, Ebn Meskavayh’s explicit intention was to point out the practical guidance that examples from history and experience can offer. Hence his contemptuous dismissal, at the outset of the book, of “entertaining stories and idle tales (al-asmār wa’l-ḵorāfāt) which merely have a soporific effect on the reader.” Moreover, he openly eschewed dwelling upon the element of religious motivation in history, to the extent that he even omitted the sacred biography of the Prophet himself; as he explained, he was concerned with the achievements of ordinary human beings and not with those achievements, reached with divine or supernatural aid, of saints and prophets, since they can provide no practical guidance for ordinary men (see Rosenthal, pp. 141-42).

Ebn Meskavayh’s major work in the field of philosophy is his Tahḏib al-aḵlāq wa-taṭhir al-aʿrāq. This manual of philosophy and ethics aims to provide the student with a lucid exposition of the main elements of the falsafa (q.v.) tradition. Its success is confirmed by the wide diffusion of the work and the efforts of later scholars in the field of philosophical and practical ethics to build upon its foundations, including Naṣir-al-Din Ṭusi (597-672/1201-74) in his Aḵlāq-e nāṣeri. One should mention here also Ebn Meskavayh’s Ketāb al-ḥekma al-ḵāleda (“Book of eternal wisdom”), an Arabic translation of the Persian Jāvidān ḵerad, one manuscript of which bears the title Ketāb ādāb al-ʿArab wa’l-Fors. It is probably the philosophical tinge in all his works that, as Mohammed Arkoun has noted, made Ebn Meskavayh distinctly more acceptable to the Shiʿite Persian cultural milieu than to the more strictly orthodox Sunnite one; he himself could best be characterized as an adherent of philosophical Shiʿism, comparable with the Eḵwān al-Ṣafāʾ.



H. F. Amedroz, “Note on the historian,” prefixed to facs. ed. of the Tajāreb al-omam, GMS VII/1, Leiden-London, 1909.

ʿĀmeli, Aʿyān al-šiʿa X, Damascus, 1945.

M. Arkoun, Miskawayh, philosophe et historien, contribution à l’etude de l’humanisme arabe au IV/X siècle, Paris, 1970.

Brockelmann, GAL I, pp. 417-18, Supp. I, pp. 582-84.

D. M. Donaldson, Studies in Muslim Ethics, London, 1953, pp. 121-33.

Ebn al-Qefṭi, Taʾriḵ al-ḥokamāʾ, ed. J. Lippert, Leipzig, 1903, p. 331.

M. ʿA. ʿEzzat, Ebn Meskawayh, Cairo, 1946.

M. S. Khan, “The eyewitness reporters of Miskawaih’s contemporary history,” Islamic Culture 38, 1964, pp. 295-313.

Idem, “Miskawaih and Ṯābit ibn Sinān,” ZDMG 117, 1967, pp. 303-17.

Idem, “Miskawayh and the Buwayhids,” Oriens 21-22, 1968-69, pp. 235-47.

Idem, “Miskawaih and Arabic historiography,” JAOS 89, 1969, pp. 710-30.

Moḥammad-Bāqer Ḵʷānsāri, Rawżāt al-jannāt, Tehran, 1307/1889-90, pp. 70-71.

D. S. Margoliouth, Lectures on Arabic Historians, Calcutta, 1930, pp. 128-37.

D. S. Margoliouth and H. F. Amedroz, eds. and trs., The Eclipse of the Abbasid Caliphate: Original Chronicles of the Fourth Islamic Century, 7 vols., Oxford, 1921-22.

F. Rosenthal, A History of Muslim Historiography, 2nd ed., Leiden, 1968.

Abu Ḥayyān Tawḥidi, Aḵlāq al-wazirayn, ed. M. Ṭanji, Damascus, n.d., p. 346.

Ṯaʿālebi, Tatemmat al-yatima, ed. ʿAbbās Eqbāl, Tehran, 1353/1934, I, pp. 96-100 .

Yāqut, Eršād-al-arib, II, pp. 88-96.

(C. Edmund Bosworth)

Originally Published: July 20, 2002

Last Updated: July 20, 2002

Cite this entry:

C. Edmund Bosworth, “MESKAVAYH, ABU ʿALI AḤMAD,” Encyclopædia Iranica, online edition, 2002, available at (accessed on 20 September 2016).