i. IN HISTORY AND SHIʿITE HAGIOGRAPHY
The diametrically opposed views of Henri Lammens, who made the first attempt at a biography of Fāṭema, providing a pale, even negative picture, and Louis Massignon (continued by Henry Corbin, q.v.), who conceived an ideally mystical figure, reflect to some extent the information provided in the sources, particularly the earlier sources, characterized as they are by lacunae, uncertainties, and contradictions. Laura Veccia Vaglieri demonstrated that historical reality lay somewhere between the two pictures; her long and often dense article remains the best synthetic study of Fāṭema, and it will be summarized and to some degree supplemented here.
History. In contrast to the rich hagiographic material on Fāṭema (see below), purely historical information, reported particularly in Sunni sources, is rare and usually involves only insignificant episodes. Fāṭema was probably the youngest daughter of Moḥammad and his first wife, Ḵadīja, the only daughter to live long enough to bear numerous offspring. Her date of birth is variously given as between five years before and two years after the beginning of the Prophet’s mission (Lammens, pp. 8-14). She was particularly close to her father and is said to have followed him to Medina shortly after his emigration (hejra). Although there is disagreement over details, she became the wife of the Imam ʿAlī b. Abī Ṭāleb (q.v.) while still an adolescent, probably in 2/623-24. Moḥammad arranged this marriage in obedience to divine will, having already rejected requests for her hand by Abū Bakr, ʿOmar, and probably the very wealthy ʿAbd-al-Raḥmān b. ʿAwf (Ebn Saʿd, pp. 11-20; Ebn Rostam, p. 12). Before the occupation of the prosperous oasis of Ḵaybar ʿAlī and Fāṭema were poor, and her life does not always appear to have been happy. On a few occasions, most probably owing to ʿAlī’s attempts to take other wives, the Prophet had to intervene to reconcile the couple (Ebn Ḥanbal, p. 326; Boḵārī, II, pp. 440 ff.; Termeḏī, pp. 319-21). At any rate, as long as she lived Fāṭema was ʿAlī’s only wife and bore him five children: Ḥasan, Ḥosayn, Moḥassen (or Moḥsen, dead at very young age), Omm Kolṯūm, and Zaynab. She was apparently much affected by her father’s death and died of illness in Medina a few months later, in 11/633. Reports on her death, her burial, and the exact place of her grave are contradictory (Yaʿqūbī, Taʾrīḵ II, pp. 128-30; Ṭabarī, III, pp. 2436 ff.; Masʿūdī, Morūj VI, p. 165). Today three sites in Medina are visited as her burial place. She seems to have performed only three acts of political significance, each recorded in almost all sources, both Sunni and Shiʿite, though in different versions. First, after the conquest of Mecca she refused her protection to Abū Sofyān; second, after the death of the Prophet she courageously defended ʿAlī’s cause, fiercely opposed the election of Abū Bakr, and had violent disputes with him and particularly with ʿOmar; third, she laid claim to the property rights of her father and challenged Abū Bakr’s categorical refusal to cede them, particularly Fadak and a share in the produce of Ḵaybar.
Hagiography. Hagiographical material on Fāṭema is much more ample. Whereas Sunni authors emphasized her perfectly “orthodox” virtues, in particular her rank as the daughter of the Prophet, her ascetic life, and her exemplary piety (Abu’l-Naṣr, pp. 72 ff.), Twelver Shiʿite hagiographers depicted her as a figure of cosmic significance, though early reports, as well as traditions attributed to her, are much scantier than those related to the other thirteen immaculate ones (maʿṣūm; see COSMOGONY AND COSMOLOGY v). Fāṭema was counted among the Prophet’s house (ahl al-bayt; AHL-E BAYT), the five people of the mantle (ahl al-kesāʾ; see AHL-E ʿABĀ), and the people of the ordeal (mobāhala) and thus occupies a central place in the pleroma of the immaculate ones, enjoying ontological, initiatory, and eschatological privileges of the same order as those attributed to the Prophet and the imams. Her luminous pre-existential entity, issuing from the divine light thousands of years before the creation of the world, devoted itself to the praise of God while circumambulating the divine throne (Ebn Bābūya, 1385/1966 pp. 135 ff.; Ḵazzāz, pp. 110-11, 169-70). Her name, like those of all the people of the mantle, was derived from a divine name (al-Fāṭer “the Creator”; Ebn Bābūya, 1405/1985, p. 252; Noʿmānī, p. 137; Ebn ʿAyyāš, p. 23). She was present in the light of the fourteen impeccable ones when it was placed in Adam’s loins (ṣolb). It was because of this light that angels were ordered to prostrate themselves before him (Ḥasan al-ʿAskarī, pp. 219 ff.; Ebn Bābūya, 1385/1966, pp. 6, 209; idem, 1405/1985, p. 255). Among the names God taught to Adam (Qurʾān 2:31-33) were those of the people of the mantle, including that of Fāṭema (Ḥasan al-ʿAskarī, p. 217; Forāt, p. 56).
Her conception and birth were miraculous. Her origin was in a fruit from paradise, often identified as an apple or a date, that Moḥammad had eaten during one of his ascensions and that had become “the water of his loins” (Forāt, pp. 75-76; Ebn Bābūya, 1385/1966, pp. 183-84). According to one tradition, this fruit had previously been touched by the sweat and a plume from the wing of the angel Gabriel (Forāt, pp. 321-22). It was for this reason that the Prophet always said that Fāṭema was a celestial being in human form (ḥūrāʾ ensīya), that she emitted the perfume of paradise, and that she had a name in heaven (usually Manṣūra). Fāṭema spoke with her mother while still in the womb. All the most pious women recognized from pre-Islamic religions were present at her birth, namely, Sarah (Sārā), Āsīa, Sephora (Ṣafūrāʾ), and especially Mary the mother of Jesus (Ebn Rostam, p. 9; Ḥosayn, pp. 48 ff.). These names are often linked with that of Fāṭema, and parallels with Mary are particularly frequent, parallels emphasized by Massignon in all his works on Fāṭema (cf. Ayoub, 1976, pp. 165 ff.; idem, 1978, s.v.; McAuliffe, 1981). Yet Fāṭema’s superiority to other women is always underscored. She is given the epithet “the Great Lady/the Best of Free Women” (sayyedat/ḵīārat al-nesāʾ/al-ḥarāʾer; cf. the epithet of the mother of the qāʾem “the Great Lady/the Best of Slave Women [al-emāʾ]; Noʿmānī, pp. 331 ff.; Ebn Qūlūya, pp. 54, 78, 123-24). At her birth Fāṭema pronounced sacred formulas and announced future events; the world was bathed in light (Ebn Šahrāšūb, pp. 119 ff.).
In fact, light and Fāṭema are always linked: at the anthropogonic stage already mentioned, in Shiʿite commentaries on the Light verse, and at her birth and later in her life, especially when she prayed and meditated. She is said to have been “the source of the light on the horizon,” and it is for that reason that she is called “the Confluence of the Two Lights” (majmaʿ al-nūrayn, i.e., those of exoteric prophecy and of the esoteric imamate; Marandī, pp. 4-19), and that her most famous epithet was al-Zahrāʾ (Resplendent; Ḥosayn, pp. 46 ff.; Ebn Šahrāšūb, pp. 106 ff.). Ebn Šahrāšūb (pp. 133 ff.) listed more than seventy honorary names for Fāṭema, among which the most common are Maryam Kobrā (the supreme Mary), Batūl (lit., “Virgin,” defined by the Prophet as “she who never menstruates”; Ebn Bābūya, 1385/1966, p. 181), and the mysterious Omm Abīhā (Mother of her father), which has been variously interpreted.
In addition to light, the life of Fāṭema was characterized by piety; sadness over the destinies of her relatives and children; courage; obedience to God, her father, and her husband; and initiatory knowledge (ʿelm; for this translation, see Amir-Moezzi, pp. 174-99; on Fāṭema’s knowledge, cf. Ḥasan al-ʿAskarī, pp. 221-22; Ebn Bābūya, 1404/1984, p, 596; Ebn Šahrāšūb, pp. 102-4). She is the guardian of two of the secret and sacred books of the immaculate ones, Ketāb Fāṭema and Moṣḥaf Fāṭema, which may in fact be only a single book, and two secret tablets, of white pearl and emerald respectively (Amir-Moezzi, pp. 188-89; Kohlberg, pp. 302-05). Miracles resulting from her superior nature, piety, and esoteric knowledge are frequently attributed to her (Ebn Šahrāšūb, pp. 16 ff.; Borsī, pp. 85-86; Majlesī, pp. 19-81).
Other salient points in the hagiography of Fāṭema have been brought together by Veccia Vaglieri: her betrothal and marriage to ʿAlī, raised to the level of cosmic events; her glorious resurrection on the Day of Judgment; her complaint to God about the injustices wreaked by the community on her kinsmen and followers; her intervention in favor of the Shiʿites; and her hagiography as it developed in other branches of Shiʿism, specifically the Bāṭenīya (q.v.).
Finally, according to early Imami writings, the name Fāṭema is explicitly mentioned in the “integral” Qurʾān (in 20:115; see Kolaynī, p. 283; on the “integral” Qurʾān, see Amir-Moezzi, pp. 200-27), and early Imami exegetes, finding allusions to Fāṭema in a number of suras, sometimes resorted to rather daring interpretations, for example, identification of the “night of the decree” (laylat al-qadr) or the “holy spirit” (al-rūḥ al-qods) with the daughter of the Prophet (Forāt, pp. 581-82). These interpretations differ little in nature from those of “extremist” Shiʿites (see ḠOLĀT), some of whom identify her with the cavern of the Seven Sleepers or with the rock of Moses from which water gushes forth (characterized by Veccia Vaglieri, p. 849, as “deviant”). The distinction between early esoteric Imamism and the Shiʿism considered “extremist” must be made with great care (Amir-Moezzi, pp. 313-16).
Bibliography
(for cited works not given in detail, see “Short References”):
ʿO. Abu’l-Naṣr, Faṭema bent Moḥammad omm al-šohadāʾ wa sayyedat al-nesāʾ, Cairo, 1366/1947.
M. A. Amir-Moezzi, Le guide divin dans le shiʿisme originel. Aux sources de l’ésotérisme en Islam, Paris, 1992; tr. D. Streight as The Divine Guide in Early Shiʿism, Albany, N.Y., 1994.
M. Ayoub, “Towards an Islamic Christology: An Image of Jesus in Early Shīʿī Muslim Literature,” Muslim World 66, 1976, pp. 163-88.
Idem, Redemptive Suffering in Islam: A Study of the Devotional Aspects of ʿÃshûrâ in Twelver Shiʿism, The Hague, 1978.
Moḥammad Boḵārī, al-Jāmeʿ al-ṣaḥīḥ, n.p. [Cairo], 1360/1940.
Ḥāfeẓ Rajab Borsī, Mašāreq anwār al-yaqīn, 10th ed., Beirut, n.d.
H. Corbin, Terre céleste et corps de résurrection. De l’Iran mazdéen à l’Iran shiʿite, Paris, 1960.
Idem, En Islam iranien, 4 vols., Paris 1971-72. al-Ḏarīʿa I, pp. 343-44.
Ebn Ayyāš Jawharī, Moqtażab al-aṯar, Tehran, 1346/1927.
Ebn Bābuya, ʿElal al-šarāʾīʿ wa’l-aḥkām, 2 vols. in 1, Najaf, 1385/1966.
Idem, al-Amālī, ed. and tr. M.–B. Kamaraʾī, Tehran, 1404/1984.
Idem, Kamāl al-din wa tamām al-neʿma, 2 vols. in 1, ed. ʿA.–A. Ḡaffārī, Qom, 1405/1985.
Aḥmad Ebn Ḥanbal, Mosnad IV, Cairo, 1311/1893.
Ebn Qūlūya Qomī, Kāmel al-zīārāt, 11th. ed., n.p., n.d.
Ebn Qotayba (attributed), al-Emāma wa’l-sīāsa, ed. A. Rāfeʿī, Cairo, 1957, esp. pp. 12-13.
Ebn Rostam Ṭabarī, Dalāʾel al-emāma, Najaf, 1369/1949, pp. 1-58.
Ebn Saʿd, al-Ṭabaqāt al-kobrā VIII, Beirut, 1968, pp. 11-20.
Ebn Šahrāšūb, Manāqeb āl Abī Ṭāleb III, Najaf, 1375/1956, pp. 101-40.
ʿEmād-al-Dīn Ḥosayn Eṣfahānī, Zendagānī-e čahārdah maʿṣūm I, Tehran, 1340 Š./1962, pp. 221-358.
Moḥsen Fayż Kāšānī, al-Wāfī, Tehran, 1376/1957, pp. 172 ff.
Forāt b. Ebrāhīm, Tafsīr, ed. M. Kāẓem, Tehran, 1410/1990.
Nūr-al-Dīn Ḥalabī, al-Sira al-ḥalabīya III, Beirut, n.d., pp. 529, 607 ff.
Ḥasan al-ʿAskarī (attributed), Tafsīr, Qom, 1409/1989.
Ḥosayn b. ʿAbd-al-Wahhāb, ʿOyūn al-moʿjezāt, Najaf, 1369/1950.
Abu’l-Qāsem ʿAlī Ḵazzāz Rāzī, Kefāyat al-aṯar fi’l-naṣṣ ʿalā aʾemma al-eṯnay ʿašar, Tehran, 1305/1888.
E. Kohlberg, “Authoritative Scriptures in Early Imami Shiʿism,” in E. Patlagean and A. Le Boulluec, eds., Les retours aux Écritures. Fondamentalismes présents et passés, Louvain and Paris, 1993, pp. 295-312.
Moḥammad b. Yaʿqūb Kolaynī, al-Oṣūl men al-kāfī, ed. and tr. J. Moṣṭafawī, II, Tehran, n.d., pp. 355-56.
H. Lammens, Fāṭima et les filles de Mahomet: Notes critiques pour l’étude de la Sīra, Rome, 1912.
J. D. McAuliffe, “Chosen of All Women: Mary and Fāṭimah in Qurʾānic Exegesis,” Islamochristiana 7, 1981, pp. 19-28.
Moḥammad-Bāqer Majlesī, Beḥār al-anwār XLIII, Tehran and Qom, 1376-92/1956-72, pp. 2-236.
Abu’l-Ḥasan ʿAlī Marandī, Majmaʿ al-nūrayn wa moltaqa’l-baḥrayn fī aḥwāl Fāṭema al-Zahrāʾ, Tehran, 1376/1957.
L. Massignon, “Les origines de la méditation shiʿite sur Salmân et Fâṭima,” in Mélanges Henri Massé, Tehran, 1963, pp. 264-68.
Idem, Opera Minora, ed. Y. Moubarak, 3 vols., Paris, 1969.
Masʿūdī, Morūj IV, pp. 146, 156 ff.; VI, pp. 55-56, 165.
Ebn Abī Zaynab Noʿmānī, Ketāb al-ḡayba, ed. ʿA.–A. Ḡaffārī, Tehran, 1397/1977.
ʿAlī b. Ebrāhīm Qomī, Tafsīr, ed. Ṭ. M.. Jazāʾerī, 2 vols., Najaf, 1386-87 /1966-68.
U. Rubin, “Pre-Existence and Light: Aspects of the Concept of Nūr Muḥammad,” Israel Oriental Studies 5, 1975, pp. 62-119.
T. Sabri, “L’hagiographie de Fâṭima d’après le Biḥâr al-Anwâr de Muḥammad Bâqir Majlisî (m. 1111/1699),” Ph.D. diss., École Pratique des Hautes Études, Paris, 1969.
Ṭabarī (Cairo2), I-II, s.v. Abū ʿĪsā Moḥammad Termeḏī, Sonan, ed. A. M. Šāker, Cairo, 1356/1936.
L. Veccia Vaglieri, “Fāṭima,” in EI2 II, pp. 841-50.
Abū ʿAbd-Allāh Moḥammad Wāqedī, Ketāb al-maḡāzī, ed. J. Wellhausen, Cairo, 1970, s.v. Yaʿqūbī, Taʾrīkò II, pp. 19, 35, 42, 91, 128 ff., 141 ff.
