NEOLITHIC AGE IN IRAN. Originally the term “Neolithic” referred to the final Stone Age before the ages of metals, that is: the Chalcolithic (copper), Bronze, and Iron Ages. Today “Neolithic” usually refers to the period of the origins and early development of agricultural economies. The oldest evidence for agriculture comes from the eastern Mediterranean (Levant) where agriculture came into practice 11,000 years ago at the end of, or shortly after, the Younger Dryas cold interval during which much of the region was not inhabited (Alley). An abrupt shift to warmer climate then allowed the cereal grasses and trees to expand from the Levant, taking about 1,000 years to reach Iran (Hole, 1999).

As this expansion of natural vegetation took place, agriculture spread with it. The domestication of goats and sheep, on the other hand, occurred in northern Mesopotamia and the Zagros mountains, perhaps in Kurdistan and southern Anatolia (Zeder). The combination of agriculture (wheat, barley, lentils) and the raising of livestock (goats, sheep, cattle, pigs), formed the basis of the agricultural economy that has lasted until today and spread throughout the world (Harris et al.; Nesbitt, 2002). The Neolithic began in Iran about 10,000 years before the present (B.P.) and ended about 7,500 B.P. (for a review of the Initial and Early Village Periods that comprise the Neolithic of western Iran, see Hole, 1987a; 1987b). The earliest Neolithic occurred before the use of hand-made, chaff-tempered pottery which appeared around 8,500 B.P. The Neolithic ends with the appearance of new styles of pottery, generally with designs painted in black on a buff background.

The Neolithic occurred when temperature and rainfall were somewhat higher than today so that conditions for primitive farming, employing only hand tools for cultivation, were excellent. All known Neolithic sites in Iran were situated in regions where rain-fed agriculture was possible. Settlements were few and often widely separated, usually in locales with a good source of water, arable land, fuel, as well as wild plant and animal foods, which people continued to gather and hunt (Bernbeck, 2001; Hole, 1987a; 1987b). A typical settlement consisted of only 50-100 inhabitants who lived in houses of unbaked brick, or in tents or brush shelters, and kept their livestock in pens. The form of the houses and their nucleation into small settlements has characterized rural villages until the present, some 9,000 years after they first appeared. During the Neolithic there is no apparent evidence of social differentiation among individuals, nor are there temples or other special structures (Bernbeck, 1995).

The early Neolithic (10,000-9,300 B.P.) preceded the use of pottery, and tools were still made exclusively of flint or wood and fiber. Crude figurines of sheep, goats, pigs, dogs, cattle, and people were often made of unbaked clay (Daems). Well after the introduction of agriculture and the building of villages, clay was first used to make chaff-tempered pottery vessels. People sometimes wore bracelets, pendants, and beaded skirts, pierced their lips with labrets, and displayed deliberately deformed skulls (Hole, 1977, p. 91; Meikeljohn et al.). Burials were normally placed under the floors of houses or in an open part of the settlement, usually within the walls of an abandoned house. Tools for harvesting crops, butchering, working hides, and other tasks were made from flint, while grinding stones, mortars, and pestles were made from limestone. Native pure copper from the central Iranian plateau was hammered into beads and pins. Obsidian from central Anatolia, turquoise from Afghanistan, and shells from the Persian Gulf, all are found in Neolithic sites, indicating widespread contacts through trade and other means.

Our knowledge of the Neolithic comes largely from the central Zagros mountain valleys and adjacent lowlands, although future exploration and excavation will undoubtedly enlarge this picture, particularly in southern and northeastern Iran. The lowland edge of the Mesopotamian plain, Khuzestan and Deh Luran, has produced the most informative and most complete sequences of the Neolithic in Iran. The region of Kurdistan, on the other hand, has a number of important early Neolithic sites in the territory of twentieth-century Iraq. Most of central Iran is too arid and the mountain zones are either too rugged or too high to support agriculture. Early farmers were therefore concentrated in the flat, mid-level and lower valleys of the Zagros where conditions were most favorable. There has been little excavation of neighboring Afghanistan, but Neolithic sites in Central Asia and northeastern Iran begin a thousand years later than in western Iran.


Because of its size and geographic diversity, it is useful to conceive of core areas, each of which is large enough to have fostered distinct and thriving societies throughout the Neolithic and beyond. The principal regions are the northern, the central, and the southern Zagros, the Khuzestan lowland, southern Iran, and the northeastern Kopet Dag region. Most of southern Iran, which is likely to have been important in the Neolithic, has not been sufficiently investigated, a situation that also pertains to much of the northeast. Outside Iran proper, Turkmenistan shares much with northeastern Iran, while Afghanistan, potentially important, has seen little exploration. To the west of Iran, Kurdistan in both contemporary Iraq and Turkey figures importantly in our story. The land of Iraq east of the Tigris holds Neolithic sites comparable with those on the Iranian side.

Only a handful of Neolithic sites have been excavated and published in sufficient detail to inform on the process of Neolithization and its regional variations. From north to south, these are Hajji Firuz on the Solduz plain of Azerbaijan, Tepe Sarab on the Kermanshah plain, Tepe Guran in the Hulailan valley, Tepe Abdul Hosein and Ganj Dareh in the high mountains of Luristan, Tall-e Jari and Tall-e Mushki in Marv Dasht, Tepe Ali Kosh and Chogha Sefid, also spelled Chagha Sefid, (see ČOḠĀ SAFID) in Deh Luran, and Tepe Tula’i and Chogha Bonut in Khuzestan. Final reports are available only for Hajji Firuz, Abdul Hosein, Ali Kosh, Chogha Sefid, and Chogha Bonut, although important aspects of each of the others are published. Pre-pottery sites in the lowland at the base of the Zagros and possibly in the Luristan mountains are probably numerous but, because of burial or erosion by geological processes, such sites may have disappeared from view (Brookes, Dennell, and Levine; Kirkby).

Lowland of western Iran: When Ali Kosh and Chogha Sefid were excavated in 1963 and 1969, they revealed the longest continuous sequence of Neolithic occupations and the oldest substantial evidence for agriculture and animal husbandry in Iran (Hole, 1977; Hole, Flannery, and Neely), although recent information places the domestication of goats at Ganj Dareh, which is some 500 years older (Zeder and Hesse). Ali Kosh has three phases of occupation, two of which occurred before the use of pottery, while Chogha Sefid, with one pre-pottery phase, extends the series into the Chalcolithic. Two pre-pottery phases, Bus Mordeh and Ali Kosh exist on the Deh Luran plain. These are followed by three pottery Neolithic phases, denoted by changes in the type and style of the ceramic wares, along with gradual changes in flint tools and house construction. The developments appear to be entirely locally engendered, although some pottery is of types that are found in the mountain plains, presumably arriving in Deh Luran by trade or through visits by travelers (Hole, 1987a, p. 47).

The people of Deh Luran farmed around the edge of seasonally wet or marshy areas, raised goats and sheep, and hunted gazelles and onagers. During the course of the Neolithic a number of new villages were established in response to population increase (Neely and Wright, p. 234). The Neolithic comes to an end with the intrusion of new techniques of making pottery and the introduction of irrigation agriculture by people who may have migrated in from nearby Iraq (Hole, 1977, pp. 12-13). At the end of the Neolithic there is also a marked decline in the use of flint tools and in the skill with which flint was chipped, a change that is seen in all regions.

A survey of the Mehran plain, north of Deh Luran but in the same environment, discovered Choga Khulaman, a pre-pottery site (Ḵaliliyān). Other sites on the Iraqi side have also been reported (Mortensen, 2002; Oates, 1966). A probable source for the immigrants to Deh Luran at the end of the Neolithic is the Mandali plain on the border with Iraq(Oates, 1973; 1983).

Tepe Tula’i was a campsite of herding people who lived in tent-like structures on the semi-arid steppe of Khuzestan (Hole, 1974). Tula’i remains the principal excavated example of such a campsite, although other possible sites have been reported (Abdi). It is located a considerable distance from any surface water, on land that was used in historic times exclusively as pasture for migrant tribes. The discovery of stones outlining walls and internal platforms, which are identical to those used by modern herders to store their goods off ground, indicate that this was a herders’ camp. Dating to the early stages of pottery use in Iran, Tula’i may have been used seasonally as pasture by people who practiced limited agriculture elsewhere in Khuzestan (Bernbeck, 1992, Pires-Ferreira). The ceramics, flint tools, and figurines compare closely with those from Deh Luran and Choga Bonut in Khuzestan (Alizadeh, 1997, pp. 6-8; Daems), but the lack of either sickles or grinding stones reinforces the fact that Tula’i was not an agricultural site.

Choga Bonut in the central part of the Khuzestan plain is one of the few Neolithic sites excavated since the Iranian Revolution, containing preceramic and early pottery Neolithic occupations (Alizadeh, 2003). The pre-pottery phase was excavated over only a very small area, and exposed a series of fire pits or hearths, but no houses. The Archaic 0 Phase, with pottery, had small mud brick houses, typical of the era. In all respects the material culture, from flint to figurines and grinding stones, resembles that from Tepe Ali Kosh and Tula’i. At the present, however, aceramic Ghogha Bonut is the oldest site known on the Khuzestan plain. The Neolithic pottery sequence at Chogha Bonut continues at the nearby site of Choga Mish (see ČOḠĀ MIŠ; Alizadeh, 1996). This sequence, the Archaic O-2 Phases, exactly parallels the sequence in Deh Luran, and ends with the local shift to buff-ware pottery.

Mountain valleys of the central Zagros: Tepe Guran was excavated in 1963 by a Danish team. This small settlement in the Hulailan valley has a sequence from pre-pottery through the early stages of pottery manufacture (Mortensen, 1963; 1972). The single radiocarbon date from the preceramic component suggests an age of about 9,000 B.P. (Voigt, p. 637). The first settlers may have been transhumant herders who lived in wooden huts during the winter in this natural pasture at 900 m above sea level. It was only around 8,200 B.P. that the village became a permanent settlement with mud brick houses and ceramics similar to those at Sarab.

Sarab was the seasonal camp of a transhumant herding group on the vast Mahi Dasht; today this site is near the city of Kermanshah. Although no foundations of tent sites were discovered, the absence of houses and agricultural implements, along with a preponderance of sheep and goat bones, indicates the presence of a seasonal camp. In recent years Kurdish tribes, which moved into the plain during the summer from their lowland winter camps, built summer structures of reeds, closely resembling the remains at Sarab. The Sarab stone tools and pottery are like those from the Mohammad Jaffar Phase at Tepe Ali Kosh (6100-5800 B.C.E.). Sarab yielded a particularly rich assemblage of unbaked clay figurines of dogs, sheep/goat, and human females (Broman Morales; Daems). Radiocarbon dates place the site at about 8,500 B.P., partly contemporary with later Tepe Guran. A subsequent excavation of another part of Sarab revealed ceramics from a later Neolithic occupation and traces of mud walling, suggesting a more permanent settlement (McDonald, p. 312). Some of the sherds with white paint in the later settlement are also found in the late Neolithic at Chogha Sefid (Hole, 1987a, p. 47).

The Mahi Dasht is on the Khorasan Road, the major route from lowland Mesopotamia to the Iranian plateau. As one of the few natural ways to cross the Zagros mountains, trade and the mixing of traditions is expected. The Neolithic ends with the appearance of two new styles of pottery. One is called J Ware, and is derived from the upper-Mesopotamian Halaf tradition. This style is found precisely on this route into the mountains. The other ceramic style is known as Dalma tradition, after the site Dalma Tepe in Azerbaijan where it was first found. It also penetrates the central Zagros, primarily in the Mahi Dasht and higher valleys on the Khorasan Road (Hole, 1987a, pp. 47-48).

Tepe Ganj Dareh is situated at 1,400 m above sea level in Luristan, and has the oldest evidence, dated to about 10,000 B.P., for goat domestication in Iran (Zeder and Hesse). This tiny site may have been used only seasonally because of the cold winters and heavy snow cover at this altitude, although other small sites of similar age are known from the same general region (Smith and Mortensen). The site contains little mud brick rooms, probably used for storage of grain (Smith, 1976; Smith, 1978). Like some semi-nomadic people in the region today, herders may have planted summer crops near Ganj Dareh while they made use of the highland pastures and stored the grain for use during the following summer.

Tepe Abdul Hosein is located at 1,860 m above sea level in the Khava mountain valley of Luristan. It is one of the oldest Neolithic sites yet excavated in this region, dating to about 9,500 B.P., somewhat later than Ganj Dareh and about the same age as the preceramic Deh Luran sites, as indicated by the stone tools that are comparable with those from Tepe Ali Kosh and Chogha Sefid (Pullar, pp. 103-156). The oldest layers, consisting of a series of fire pits, are preceramic, while later layers have mud brick walls. The sparse pottery from the upper layers resembles types dating to the early fifth millennium B.C.E. (ibid., pp. 157-168); it would appear that the site was abandoned for a few thousand years between the main periods of occupation.

Northwestern Iran: Hajji Firuz on the Solduz plain is dated to 7,900-7,500 B.P. Both the date and the pottery link it securely with Hassuna sites of lowland Mesopotamia (Voigt, p. 324). Today this area is winter pasture for transhumant herders who migrate seasonally between the lowlands and the highlands. Like other contemporary sites, Hajji Firuz was a small village with single-family dwellings inside of which the dead were buried. The economy was a mix of farming and herding, perhaps with seasonal migration. Of special interest is the discovery of the residue of resinated wine in a pottery jar, the oldest evidence of wine in the world (McGovern et al.).

At this time there is no indication of older settlements in this region, suggesting that agriculture and herding moved belatedly here as compared with the central Zagros at such sites as Ganj Dareh, Abdul Hosein, and Sarab. Curiously the region also may have lacked permanent settlements for a thousand years after Hajji Firuz was abandoned. The next ceramic phase is known as Dalma tradition and contemporary with early Chalcolithic cultures elsewhere. This type of pottery signals the end of the Neolithic in the Mahi Dasht.

Southern Iran (Fars): Tall-e Mushki and Tall-e Jari are Neolithic sites in southern Iran near the city of Shiraz. Both have been excavated by a Japanese team, but poorly reported. The older, Mushki (8,000-7,500 B.P.), was excavated in 1965 (Fukai, Horiuchi, and Matsutani), while Jari (7,500-6,900 B.P.) was dug in 1959 (Egami;Nishiaki, fig. 3). The Marv Dasht is about 1,600 m in elevation, and in recent historic times has been summer pasture of Bakhtiari (BAḴTIĀRI TRIBE) and Qashgai (see QAŠQĀʾI TRIBAL CONFEDERACY) pastoralists.

Muskhi has relatively crude, chaff-tempered pottery with black or brown paint on a dark-red surface, a tradition that continues with Jari pottery, though with new designs and vessel shapes. Of particular interest was the finding of 391 earpools made of clay, suggesting the possibility that they were made for export. Persian Gulf shells, copper artifacts, and some obsidian point to widespread interregional contacts (Fukai, Horiuchi, and Matsutani). The absence of substantial architecture, coupled with the relatively shallow site, suggests that Mushki may have been occupied only seasonally. The survey of the Marv Dasht has turned up only six Mushki sites, while there are 48 with Jari-style pottery, and another 28 in nearby regions (Sumner, table 1). The great increase in numbers of sites implies sedentary populations at least during the Jari period.

Iraqi Kurdistan and eastern Anatolia. A few sites are relevant to the development of agriculture, and some of these are older than any Iranian agricultural site yet excavated.

Hallan Cemi on a tributary of the upper Tigris in the foothills of eastern Turkey is the oldest pre-pottery Neolithic site in the region. People lived in round houses with stone bases, and may have been among the first to domesticate pigs, an animal that was introduced at Iranian sites only toward the end of the Neolithic (Redding and Rosenberg; Rosenberg et al.). There is remarkably little evidence for agriculture at this site; rather people may have gathered wild foods, including nuts and pulses as staples. Radiocarbon dates (11,000-11,500 B.P.) put this site at the end of the Younger Dryas, thus making it as old as any other Neolithic settlement.

Zawi Chemi Shanidar was small settlement with stone-based round houses in Iraqi Kurdistan. The site is roughly contemporary with Hallan Cemi, as indicated by a single radiocarbon date of 10,800 B.P. (Kozlowski, 1994b, p. 261). The abundant grinding stones and pestles imply the processing of plant food, but it is not known whether cultivation or simply the harvesting of wild cereals was being carried out at this stream-side site. Skulls of fifteen goats, probably wild, and the remains of wing bones from seventeen raptorial birds (buzzards, vultures, eagles) were recovered from one cache, suggesting ritual activity (Solecki, pp. 53-54). The location of this site and its relatively insubstantial nature may indicate that it was a seasonal camp of people who migrated from a site in the lowlands like M’lefaat. It is just a short distance from Iranian Kurdistan which has seen few archaeological surveys, except in the foothills.

M’lefaat, Nemrik, and Qermez Dere are three small, contemporary pre-pottery sites (ca. 9,700 B.P.) in Iraq that are situated at the junction of different ecological zones: the vast Assyrian steppe, a river valley, and the foothills of the Zagros mountains (Kozlowski, 1998; Nesbitt, 1998). M’lefaat has at least two architectural layers, both featuring semi-subterranean round houses, similar to those from Nemrik (Kozlowski, 1998; Kozlowski and Kempisty) and Qermez Dere (Watkins, Baird, and Betts ). Perhaps reflecting the richness of the environment for hunting, none of the bones from M’lefaat was from a domestic species (Turnbull). The construction of round houses is typical of the earliest communities in the Near East, none of which has unequivocal evidence for the growing of crops or for domesticated herd animals (Lasota-Moskalewska; Nesbitt, 1998). Nevertheless, settlements such as these represent an essential step toward a full-scale agricultural economy, and it is likely that at least some cultivation was being carried out. All sites have the necessary grinding stones, mortars, and pestles for processing plant food. Although these communities were within 100 km of each other, the artifacts from M’lefaat more closely resemble those from sites in the Zagros (Kozlowski, 1994a), whereas those at Nemrik (Kozlowski, 1998, p. 189) and Qermez Dere (Watkins; Watkins, Baird, and Betts) resemble those farther to the west ( Kozlowski, 1998, p. 237). Occupation at each of these sites was intermittent, and they were abandoned well before pottery arrived in the region.

Jarmo in Iraqi Kurdistan was the first site in the region to be investigated primarily in order to elucidate the process of domestication. Braidwood’s teams found a sequence parallel to that of Tepe Ali Kosh and Chogha Sefid (Braidwood; Braidwood and Howe; Broman Morales). Since it was excavated before flotation methods for the extraction of seed remains had been introduced to archaeology, the site did not yield direct evidence for agriculture, although the presence of tools and permanent houses left little doubt that it was an agricultural settlement. The faunal remains did, however, provide an early glimpse of pig domestication (Flannery) along with that of sheep and goat. The first occupation of the site was before the use of pottery which appeared without other changes in the latest layers. The lithics and ceramics are comparable and presumably contemporary with those at Tepe Sarab and Ali Kosh, although the radiocarbon dates are highly variable and not dependable (Kozlowski, 1994b, p. 263).

Northeastern Iran and Turkmenistan: Jeitun sites. The oldest evidence to date of the Neolithic in this region comes from sites in Turkmenistan that are collectively named after Jeitun on the edge of the Karakum desert. Since rainfall is too low to support cultivation without irrigation, Jeitun took advantage of the benefit of a high water table, perhaps a swamp margin or seasonally flooded surface, to support an economy based on cereal cultivation, the herding of sheep and goats, and hunting (Harris and Gosden; Harris et al.; Kohl, 1981; 1984). The houses at Jeitun have only a single room with plastered floors and a fireplace. The artifacts, from flint tools to figurines and labrets, closely resemble those found at all other early Neolithic sites, although the pottery has distinctive designs (Masson, fig. 2). Jeitun is dated to 8,000-7,800 B.P., and thus contemporary with the later ceramic Neolithic in western Iran. It is likely, however, that earlier sites will one day be found on both the northern and southern slopes of the Kopet Dag where rainfall is greater.

Two sites in Iran, Tureng and Yarim on the Gorgan river plain between the eastern Alborz mountains and the southeastern coast of the Caspian sea have Jeitun-like ceramics in their oldest layers. A third site, Sang-e Chakmak is on the eastern side of the mountains in the Šāhrud region near Basṭām. This site consists of a number of small mounds, the westernmost of which had material like that of the Jeitun sites, although it contained only a few ceramic sherds. It yielded a radiocarbon date of 8,300 B.P., so far the oldest Neolithic site in eastern Iran (Harris, Charles, and Gosden, p. 376; Masuda). Recent exploration in the same region has discovered two additional sites of the same period (Reżvāni).

Herding and hunting camps on the Caspian sea with Mesolithic and Neolithic layers include the caves (see ḠĀR) of Jebel and Damdamcheshme 2, both of which have bones of domestic goats and sheep and abundant bones of hunted gazelle, onager, and fish, but no evidence of agriculture (Kohl, 1984, pp. 41-42; Sarianidi, pp. 115-116). These sites are on a northward extension of the Kopet Dag, facing west over the Caspian sea. Much more work needs to be done to establish the nature of such sites and their relationship to Jeitun and the spread of agriculture to this relatively lush environment with its wealth of wild foods.

Afghanistan. No recent archaeological work has been done in this region, but the two cave sites of Ghar-e Mar and Ghar-e Asp at Ak Kupruk, in the piedmont zones of the Balḵāb river in northern Afghanistan, have grinding stones, sickle blades, and bones of reportedly domestic sheep and goats. A Neolithic pastoral economy has been suggested, but as yet no village sites have been excavated (Dupree, p. 263).


The present evidence shows that agriculture spread from its heartland in the eastern Mediterranean across Iran and into Central Asia with a similar set of agricultural tools, crops, and animals. The movement of the entire complex, from the cereal grains to sheep and goats, may have resulted from expansion of the human populations that ensued after agriculture enhanced the food supply. But some the movement also resulted from the seasonal treks taken by herders in search of fresh pastures. That distant lands had not been unknown since the earliest Neolithic is shown by the presence of materials such as obsidian and turquoise in sites far removed from their sources.

The Neolithic began at the end of the cold and arid Younger Dryas, when the climate became warmer and wetter than it is today and allowed for the natural spread of trees and the cereal grasses. This rebound occurred first in the eastern Mediterranean and gradually impacted the rest of the Near East. It took more than a thousand years for the conditions in Iran to become suitable for agriculture (Hole, 1998), and a similar lag occurred between western Iran and Central Asia. While the Neolithic in each successive region was delayed, its length was correspondingly shorter, so that by the time of the Bronze Age all regions were essentially changing in synchronous fashion.

The major geographic contrasts between Iran and lowland Mesopotamia strongly affected how these cultures developed. On the one hand, the elevated land of Iran results in much more severe winters, yet generates more rainfall and snow, both of which are good for agriculture. On the other, lowland Mesopotamia is generally deficient in rainfall so that it is necessary to irrigate crops, a practice that required a larger work force and a greater investment in the land (Bernbeck, 1995). Irrigation, in turn, favored larger populations and more administrative organization, which ultimately led to the first cities and literate civilizations. The rugged topography of western Iran with its limited agricultural land and the practice of rain-fed agriculture kept populations smaller and more scattered than in Mesopotamia. Consequently, there were numerous local cultures and much more variety in Iran than during corresponding times in Mesopotamia. Perhaps because of these differences, during most periods of history the cultures of Iran followed a separate trajectory from those of Mesopotamia (Hole, 1999). The ultimate result of these differences is that in Mesopotamia society became larger and more complex than in Iran where family-scale organizations prevailed throughout prehistory. But the Neolithic is the foundation on which the later Iranian and Mesopotamian cultures built.


Bibliography (annotated):

The extensive literature on the Neolithic is principally found in reports and technical articles. A synthesis and interpretation is provided by The Archaeology of Western Iran (Hole, 1987a; Hole, 1987b), while “The Chronology of Iran ca. 8000-2000 B.C.”(Voigt and Dyson) offers a region-by-region review of the chronology of Iranian prehistory. Both publications have extensive bibliographies. Site reports about Iran and adjacent regions that have subsequently appeared are: Alizadeh, 1996; 2003; Harris et al., Gosden, and Charles; Ḵaliliyān; Kozlowski, 1998; Pullar; Rosenberg and Davis; Sarianidi; and Watkins, Baird, and Betts. Works on the origins and spread of agriculture and animal domestication include: Abdi; Bernbeck; Harris and Gosden; Hole, 1998; Kozlowski, Gopher, and Korobkova; Redding and Rosenberg; Rosenberg et al.; Zeder; and Zeder and Hesse.

Kamyar Abdi, “The Early Development of Pastoralism in the Central Zagros Mountains,” Journal of World Prehistory 17, 2003, pp. 395-447.

Abbas Alizadeh, “Excavations at Chogha Bonut, an Aceramic Neolithic Site in Lowland Susiana, Southwestern Iran,” Neo-Lithics, 1997, no. 1, pp. 6-8.

Idem, Excavations at the Prehistoric Mound of Chogha Bonut, Khuzestan, Iran, Seasons 1976/77, 1977/78, and 1996, Oriental Institute publications 120, Chicago, 2003.

Abbas Alizadeh, Pinhas Delougaz, and Helene J. Kantor, eds. Chogha Mish, I: The First Five Seasons of Excavations, Oriental Institute publications 101, Chicago, 1996.

Richard B. Alley, “The Younger Dryas Cold Interval as Viewed from Central Greenland,” Quaternary Science Reviews 19, 2000, pp. 213-26.

Reinhard Bernbeck, “Migratory Patterns in Early Nomadism: A Reconsideration of Tepe Tula’i,” Paléorient 18, 1992, pp. 77-88.

Idem, “Lasting Alliances and Emerging Competition: Economic Developments in Early Mesopotamia,” Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 14, 1995, pp. 1-25.

Idem, “Forschungsperspektiven für das Iranische Neolithikum,” Archäologische Miteilungen aus Iran und Turan 33, 2001, pp. 1-18.

Robert J. Braidwood and Bruce Howe, eds., Prehistoric Investigations in Iraqi Kurdistan, Studies in ancient oriental civilization 31, Chicago, 1960.

Vivian Broman Morales, Figurines and Other Clay Objects from Sarab and Çayönü, Oriental Institute communications 25, Chicago, 1990.

Ian A. Brookes, Robin W. Dennell, and Louis D. Levine, “Alluvial Sequence in Central West Iran and Implications for Archaeological Survey,” Journal of Field Archaeology 9, 1982, pp. 285-99.

Aurelie Daems, “On Prehistoric Human Figurines in Iran: Current Knowledge and Some Reflections,” Iranica Antiqua 39, 2004, pp. 1-31.

Louis Dupree, Prehistoric Research in Afghanistan (1959-1966), Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 62/4, Philadelphia, 1972.

Namio Egami, “Excavations at Two Prehistoric Sites: Tepe Djari A and B in the Marv-Dasht Basin,” in Survey of Persian Art, ed. Arthur Upham Pope, 3rd ed., 16 vols., Tehran, 1977, pp. 2936-39.

Kent V. Flannery, “Skeletal and Radiocarbon Evidence for the Origins of Pig Domestication,” Master’s thesis, University of Chicago, 1961.

Shinji Fukai, Kiyoharu Horiuchi, and Toshiu Matsutani, Marv Dasht, III: The Excavations of Tall-i Mushki, 1965, Tokyo University Iraq-Iran Archaeological Expedition 14, Tokyo, 1973.

David R. Harris and Chris Gosden, “The Beginnings of Agriculture in Western Central Asia,” in The Origins and Spread of Agriculture and Pastoralism in Eurasia: An Overview, ed. David R. Harris, London, 1996, pp. 370-89.

David R. Harris, M. P. Charles, and Chris Gosden, “Jeitun: Recent Excavations at an Early Neolithic Site in Southern Turkmenistan,” Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 62, 1996, pp. 423-42.

David R. Harris et al., “Investigating Early Agriculture in Central Asia: New Research at Jeitun, Turkmenistan,” Antiquity 67, 1993, pp. 324-38.

Frank Hole, “Tepe Tula’i: An Early Campsite in Khuzistan, Iran,” Paléorient 2, 1974, pp. 219-42.

Idem, Studies in the Archaeological History of the Deh Luran Plain: The Excavation of Chagha Sefid, Memoirs of the Museum of Anthropology 9, Ann Arbor, 1977.

Idem, “Archaeology of the Village Period,” in The Archaeology of Western Iran: Settlement and Society from Prehistory to the Islamic Conquest, ed. Frank Hole, Washington, D.C., 1987a, pp. 29-79.

Idem, “Settlement and Society in the Village Period,” ibid., 1987b, pp. 79-105.

Idem, “The Spread of Agriculture to the Eastern Arc of the Fertile Crescent: Food for the Herders,” in The Origins of Agriculture and Crop Domestication: Proceedings of the Harlan Symposium, 10-14 May 1997, Aleppo, Syria, ed. A. B. Damania, Aleppo, 1998, pp. 83-92.

Idem, “Interregional Aspects of the Khuzestan Aceramic-Early Pottery Neolithic Sequence,” in Bāstānšenāsi o honar-e Irān: 32 maqāla dar bozorgdāšt-e ʿEzzat Allāh Negāhbān (Ezat O. Negahban), ed. ʿAbbās Alizāda et al., Tehran, 1999, pp. 20-35 (in Persian).

(First published in English in Neolithic Chipped Stone Industries of the Fertile Crescent, ed. H. G. Gebel and S. K. Kozlowski, Berlin 1994.) Frank Hole, Kent. V. Flannery, and James A. Neely, Prehistory and Human Ecology of the Deh Luran Plain: An Early Village Sequence from Khuzistan, Iran, Memoirs of the Museum of Anthropology 1, Ann Arbor, 1969.

Ali-Moḥammad Ḵaliliyān, “Chogha Khulaman: An Early Neolithic Site in Amirābād, Mehrān,” in Bāstānšenāsi o honar-e Irān: 32 maqāla dar bozorgdāšt-e ʿEzzat Allāh Negāhbān (Ezat O. Negahban), ed. ʿAbbās Alizāda et al., Tehran, 1999, pp. 36-45 (in Persian, English summary, p. 222).

Michael J. Kirkby, “Land and Water Resources of the Deh Luran and Khuzistan Plains,” in Studies in the Archeological History of the Deh Luran Plain: The Excavation of Chagha Sefid, ed. Frank Hole, Memoirs of the Museum of Anthropology 9, Ann Arbor, 1977, pp. 251-88.

Philip L. Kohl, L’Asie centrale des origines à l’âge du fer,Synthèse 14, Paris, 1984.

Idem, ed., The Bronze Age Civilization of Central Asia: Recent Soviet Discoveries, New York, 1981.

Stefan K. Kozlowski, “Chipped Neolithic Industries at the Eastern Wing of the Fertile Crescent,” in Neolithic Chipped Stone Industries of the Fertile Crescent, ed. Hans Georg Gebel and Stefan Karol Kozlowski, Berlin, 1994a, pp. 143-71.

Idem, “Radiocarbon Dates from Aceramic Iraq,” in Late Quaternary Chronology and Paleoclimates of the Eastern Mediterranean, ed. Ofer Bar-Yosef and Renee S. Kra, Tucson, 1994b, pp. 255-64.

Stefan K. Kozlowski and A. Kempisty, “Architecture of the Pre-Pottery Neolithic Settlement in Nemrik, Irak,” World Archaeology 21, 1990, pp. 348-62.

Stefan K. Kozlowski, Avi Gopher, and G. F. Korobkova, The Eastern Wing of the Fertile Crescent: Late Prehistory of Greater Mesopotamian Lithic Industries, Oxford, 1999.

Stefan K. Kozlowski, ed., “M’lefaat: Early Neolithic Site in Northern Iraq,” in Cahiers de l’Euphrate 8, 1998, pp. 179-273.

Alicja Lasota-Moskalewska, “Mammal Bone Remains from M’lefaat, Iraq (Excavation Seasons 1989 and 1990),” in “M’lefaat,” ed. Stefan K. Kozlowski, pp. 215-31.

Vadim M. Masson, “The First Farmers in Turkmenia,” Antiquity 35, 1961, pp. 203-13.

Seiichi Masuda, “Report of the Archaeological Investigations at Shahrud, 1975,” in Proceedings of the IVth Annual Symposium on Archaeological Research in Iran: 3-8 November 1975, ed. Firouz Bagherzadeh, Tehran, 1976, pp. 63-70.

Mary M. A. McDonald, “An Examination of Mid-Holocene Settlement Patterns in the Central Zagros Region of Western Iran,” Ph.D. diss., University of Toronto, 1979.

Patrick E. McGovern et al., “Neolithic Resinated Wine,” Nature, 1996, no. 381, pp. 480-81.

C. Meikeljohn et al., “Artificial Cranial Deformation in the Proto-Neolithic and Neolithic near East and Its Possible Origin: Evidence from Four Sites,” Paléorient 18, 1992, pp. 83-97.

Peder Mortensen, “Early Village Occupation: Excavations at Tepe Guran, Luristan,” Acta Archaeologica 34, 1963, pp. 110-21.

Idem, “Seasonal Camps and Early Villages in the Zagros,” in Man, Settlement and Urbanism, ed. George Dimbleby, Peter Ucko, and Ruth Tringham, London, 1972, pp. 293-97.

Idem, “A Note on the Chipped Stone Industry of Tamerkhan,” Iranica Antiqua 37, 2002, pp. 219-27.

James A. Neely and Henry T. Wright, Early Settlement and Irrigation on the Deh Luran Plain: Village and Early State Societies in Southwestern Iran, Technical report of the Museum of Anthropology 26, Ann Arbor, 1994.

Mark Nesbitt, “Preliminary Report on the Plant Remains from M’lefaat,”, in “M’lefaat,” ed. Stefan K. Kozlowski, pp. 232-33.

Idem, “When and Where Did Domesticated Cereals First Occur in Southwest Asia?” in The Dawn of Farming in the Near East, ed. Sytze Bottema and René T. J. Cappers, Studies in early Near Eastern production, subsistence, and environment 6, Berlin, 2002, pp. 113-32.

Yoshihiro Nishiaki, Prehistoric Pottery from the Marv Dasht Plain, Iran, Catalog of Archaeological Materials in the Department of Archaeology of Western Asia 6, Tokyo, 2003 (in Japanese, with legends in Japanese and English).

Joan Oates, “First Preliminary Report on a Survey in the Region of Mandali and Badra,” Sumer 22, 1966, pp. 51-60.

Idem, “The Background and Development of Early Farming Communities in Mesopotamia and the Zagros,” Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 39, 1973, pp. 147-81.

Idem, “ʿUbaid Mesopotamia Reconsidered,” in The Hilly Flanks and Beyond: Essays on the Prehistory of Southwestern Asia Presented to Robert J. Braidwood, Studies in ancient oriental civilization 36, Chicago, 1983, pp. 251-282.

Jane Wheeler Pires-Ferreira, “Tepe Tula’i: Faunal Remains from an Early Campsite in Khuzistan, Iran,” Paléorient 3, 1977, pp. 275-80.

Judith Pullar, Tepe Abdul Hosein: A Neolithic Site in Western Iran—Excavation s 1978, Oxford, 1990.

Richard W. Redding and M. Rosenberg, “Ancestral Pigs: A New (Guinea) Model for Pig Domestication in the Middle East,” in Ancestors for the Pigs: Pigs in Prehistory, ed. Sarah M. Nelson, MASCA research papers in science and archaeology 15, Philadelphia, 1998, pp. 65-76.

Ḥasan Reżvāni, “Prehistoric Settlement Patterns and Cultures in Semnân Province,” in Bāstānšenāsi o honar-e Irān: 32 maqāla dar bozorgdāšt-e ʿEzzat Allāh Negahbān (Ezat O. Negahban), ed. ʿAbbās Alizāda et al., Tehran, 1999, pp. 7-19 (in Persian, English summary pp. 220-21).

Michael Rosenberg and M. K. Davis, “Hallan Çemi Tepesi: An Early Aceramic Neolithic Site in Eastern Anatolia,” Anatolica 18, 1992: pp. 1-18.

M. Rosenberg et al., “Hallan Çemi, Pig Husbandry, and Post Pleistocene Adaptations along the Taurus-Zagros Arc (Turkey),” Paléorient 24, 1998, pp. 25-41.

Viktor I. Sarianidi, “Food-Producing and Other Neolithic Communities in Khorasan and Transoxania: Eastern Iran, Soviet Central Asia and Afghanistan,” in History of Civilizations of Central Asia, ed. A. H. Dani and V. M. Masson, 5 vols., Paris, 1992, I, pp. 109-26.

Philip E. L. Smith, “Reflections on Four Seasons of Excavations at Tepe Ganj Dareh,” in Proceedings of the IVth Annual Symposium on Archaeological Research in Iran: 3-8 November 1975, ed. Firouz Bagherzadeh, Tehran, 1976, pp. 11-22.

Idem, “An Interim Report on Ganj Dareh Tepe, Iran,” American Journal of Archaeology 82, 1978, pp. 538-40.

Philip E. L. Smith and Peder Mortensen, “Three New ‘Early Neolithic’ Sites in Western Iran,” Current Anthropology 21, 1980, pp. 511-12.

Rose L. Solecki, An Early Village Site at Zawi Chemi Shanidar, Bibliotheca Mesopotamica 13, Malibu, CA, 1981.

William M. Sumner, “Early Settlements in Fars Province, Iran,” in Mountains and Lowlands: Essays in the Archaeology of Greater Mesopotamia, ed. Louis D. Levine and T. Cuyler Young, Malibu, CA, 1977, pp. 291-305.

Pricilla F. Turnbull, “The Faunal Remains from M’lefaat,” in Prehistoric Archeology along the Zagros Flanks, Oriental Institute publications 105, Chicago, 1983, pp. 693-95.

Mary M. Voigt, “Relative and Absolute Chronologies for Iran between 6500 and 3500 B.C.,” in Chronologies in the Near East: Relative Chronologies and Absolute Chronology 16,000-4,000 B.P., ed. Olivier Aurenche, Jacques Evin, and Francis Hours, Archaeological series of Maison de l’Orient méditerranéen 3, 2 vols., Oxford, 1987, II, pp. 615-46.

Mary M. Voigt and R. H. Dyson, “The Chronology of Iran ca. 8000 –2000 B.C.,” in Chronologies in Old World History, ed. Robert W. Ehrich, 3rd ed., 2 vols., Chicago, 1992, I, pp.122-178.

Mary M. Voigt and Richard H. Meadow, Hajji Firuz Tepe: The Neolithic Settlement, University Museum monograph50, Philadelphia, 1983.

Trevor Watkins, “The Origins of House and Home?” World Archaeology 21, 1990, pp. 336-47.

Trevor Watkins, Douglas Baird, and Alison Betts, “Qermez Dere and the Early Aceramic Neolithic of N. Iraq,” Paléorient 15, 1989, pp. 19-24.

Melinda Zeder, “Animal Domestication in the Zagros: A Review of Past and Current Research,” Paléorient 25,1999, pp. 11-25.

Melinda A. Zeder and Brian Hesse, “The Initial Domestication of Goats (Capra Hircus) in the Zagros Mountains 10,000 Years Ago,” Science, 2000, no. 287, pp. 2254-57.

(Frank Hole)

Originally Published: July 20, 2004

Last Updated: July 20, 2004