SYRIAC LANGUAGE. Syriac, originally the eastern Aramaic dialect of the city of Edessa, became the most important language spoken and written by Christian communities during the Sasanian era from Egypt and Asia Minor to Syria, Iran, and Mesopotamia. Syriac is attested from the first century CE, and flourished from the fourth to the eighth centuries CE among eastern Christians who lived under the direct political authority of the Sasanian empire, or were at least under its cultural influence. After the Arab conquest, Syriac remained in use as a literary language until the thirteenth century and even later.
i. IRANIAN LOANWORDS IN SYRIAC
Syriac literature is extremely rich: most works deal with Christian religion and related matters, but there are also many works on secular subjects, such as history, philosophy, and science. The authors of Syriac literature were frequently bilingual, or trilingual (if we include Greek), and many of them were Persians who wrote in Syriac, either because they were Christian converts, or because they wrote about subjects that had a literary tradition in Syriac, such as medicine. For example, almost all the physicians of the medical academy of Gondēšāpur were Persians, yet they wrote their treatises in Syriac (see Schöffler,1980; Rosenthal, 1987, p. 254). Many works are also translations of Persian texts; for example, the juridical book of Yišōʿ-boxt, the Persian metropolitan (eighth century CE), was composed in Persian, but has come down to us in a Syriac translation made after the author’s death (edited in E. Sachau, Syrische Rechtsbücher III, Berlin, 1914, pp. 1-201).
Syriac texts contain a large amount of Iranian loanwords, but it should be borne in mind that they were borrowed at different times and from different dialect areas. As to the first point, many loanwords result from the aforementioned political and cultural contacts between eastern Christians and Sasanians; but not all the Iranian loanwords in Syriac were borrowed in Sasanian times. Speakers of Iranian and Aramaic languages were in contact from the earliest times of the Achaemenid empire onwards, and probably already in the eighth century BCE (see Lemaire, 1998; for the linguistic contacts between Old Persian and Official Aramaic, see Folmer, 1995). Consequently, Syriac inherited many Iranian words previously absorbed by Official Aramaic during the Achaemenid era, and by later varieties of Aramaic. In this case, we can speak of Iranian loanwords in Syriac only from an historical point of view, but from a synchronic point of view it would be anachronistic to regard them as borrowings, because these Old Persian words, inherited from Official Aramaic, behaved exactly as those belonging to the indigenous Syriac lexicon. A strong indication that these words were no longer perceived as foreign is the fact that these old borrowings often became productive and were the starting point for the creation of denominal verbs, often attested also in other post-biblical Aramaic varieties. For example, Syr. gazzā “treasure” is inherited from Official Aramaic gnzʾ, an old borrowing from Old Persian *ganza-; its complete assimilation into the indigenous lexicon of Syriac is proved by the presence of the denominal verb GNZ “to preserve, to accumulate” attested in Syriac (only in the form of the passive participle gənīz), in Babylonian Jewish Aramaic, in Hebrew (see Mancini, 1987, pp. 36 ff. and passim; Telegdi, 1935, p. 237.42; Shaked, 1987, p. 260). Other old borrowings that gave rise to denominal verbs are, e.g.: dšnʾ “gift” (Old Persian dāšna-, MPers. dāšn); hdmʾ “member” (OPers. *handāma-, MPers. handām); zynʾ “weapon” (OPers. *zaina-, Av. zaēna-, MPers. zēn); mgwšʾ “Magian” (OPers. maguš); rʾzʾ, rzʾ “secret, mystery” (OPers. *rāza-, Av. razah-, MPers. rāz); šrgʾ “lamp” (Parth. čirāγ).
Another conspicuous group of Iranian borrowings dates from the New Persian period; borrowings from New Persian are especially abundant in later Syriac authors, such as Bar Hebraeus (see EBN AL-ʿEBRI) and Michael the Syrian (twelfth-thirteenth centuries CE), and in lexical works, such as the lexicon compiled by Bar Bahlul (tenth century). Some of these loanwords from New Persian were borrowed indirectly through Arabic, as their phonological shape sometimes indicates; but, in general, their exact provenance is difficult to determine.
As far as the different dialect origin of Iranian loanwords is concerned, we note that, as in other Middle Aramaic dialects, a group of Iranian loanwords in Syriac shows non-southwestern phonologic features. It is incorrect to think that in such cases we always deal with words borrowed from Parthian during the Arsacid era. First of all, it is necessary to distinguish between the dialectal features of a loanword and the language from which it is actually borrowed. For instance, many loanwords showing northwestern features are very old, and Official Aramaic surely borrowed them from Old Persian: here we deal with words of remote Median origin, borrowed by Old Persian, that entered Official Aramaic, and from the latter they spread to many Middle Aramaic dialects, Syriac included.
To give only some examples, Syr. wrdʾ “rose” (Arm. loanword vard, Talmud. Aram. wrdʾ, Mand. wʾrdʾ) is considered by Widengren (1960, p. 103) a loanword from Parthian vard (while Middle Persian has gul), but in fact it is a loanword already attested in Official Aramaic as wrd: therefore, it is most likely that the word was borrowed in the Achaemenid period and from Old Persian *vrda-. Another example is Syr. ʾšpzʾ, špzʾ, špyzʾ, ʾšpyz- “house”: cf. Parth. əspinž, MPers. aspinǰ, attested in Mand. špynzʾ; Talmud. Aram. ʾwšpzʾ; Armenian loanword aspnǰakan. The presence of the voiceless postalveolar fricative /š/ in all the Aramaic forms, surely a secondary phenomenon, proves that the word was not borrowed independently for each of the Aramaic varieties. This strengthens Telegdi’s hypothesis (1935, pp. 231 ff. and 218) that the word had already been acquired by Official Aramaic.
The question of loanwords from Middle Iranian is more complicated. Some of the Iranian words in Syriac show Parthian features, and therefore a number of scholars asserted that these words were borrowed from Parthian in the Arsacid period. As Shaked rightly pointed out, speaking about Iranian loanwords in Middle Aramaic (1987, pp. 259 ff.), such a hypothesis is in many cases difficult to defend on linguistic grounds alone. Frequently, words that display Parthian phonetic features are also commonly employed in Middle Persian, a language that had became a koiné at an early stage. Syriac probably borrowed these words from Middle Persian, and not from Parthian. This must be the case of Syr. byspnʾ “messenger, postal courier” < Parth. bayāspān, a word also attested in Pahlavi, together with the southwestern form dayaspān > dēspān. It is possible that Syriac borrowed some Parthian words directly from Parthian, and not through Middle Persian. This is more likely to have occured when the Parthian words in question had not been absorbed into Middle Persian. But also in this case the loanwords were not necessarily borrowed into Syriac during the Arsacid period, because Parthian continued to exist as a language of culture and trade for a long time after the Arsacid period. Therefore, it is not sufficient to rely on phonological criteria if we want to ascertain that an Iranian loanword in Syriac was borrowed from Parthian, but we must consider several other semantic, philological, textual, and cultural factors.
Further examples of Iranian loanwords in Syriac which display non-southwestern features are: ʾhmrʾgr “accountant,” OIr. *ahmā/ăr-kara- Parth. ahmā/ărkar, MPers. āmārgar, Arm. LW hamarakar; ʾwznʾ, wznʾ ʾāwzānā, wāznā “cistern,” MIr. *āβzan, NPers. ābzan and ābdān; ʾspydkʾ, spydg“white lead,” MPers. spēdag; ʾspstʾ “alfalfa, lucerne,” MPers. aspast, OPers. *aspā/ăsti?- (Median; Hinz, 1975, p. 45); ʾsprsʾ, ʾsprysʾ “race-course,” MPers. asprēs, Arm. LW asparēs, -ēz; ʾmbrʾ “store,” MPers. hambār, OPers. *hambāra- (cf. Hinz, 1975, pp. 112 ff.), Arm. LW ambar, Talmud. Aram. ʾmbrʾ; brzʾ “sown field,” MPers. warz, Av. varəza-, OPers. *varδa- (Hinz, 1975, p. 256), Arm. LW varj; dyzdrʾ “governor of a castle,” OPers. *dizā- and diδā- (Hinz, 1975, p. 88; see Ciancaglini, 2005).
Another important aspect of the Iranian loanwords in Syriac is their number. They are of utmost importance for Iranian lexicography, particularly because Syriac preserves several Middle Iranian words not attested elsewhere. Nonetheless, a modern systematic study about this topic is still lacking; de Lagarde’s work was published in 1866 and is out of date in many respects.
Syriac texts show several hundreds of Iranian loanwords. It is hard to believe that all these loanwords were actually used in the spoken language. It has long been recognized that Syriac literature shows a number of “occasional quotations,” which either add local color or try to fill gaps in the local vocabulary. These “occasional quotations” (called casuals in the linguistic literature) do not qualify as real loanwords, which are as a rule much more deeply rooted in the receiving language; they are often introduced by sentences like “as it is said in Persian” or “as Persians usually say.” For example, Syr. krbwz “oryx” (MPers. xar-buz) is attested only once, as a gloss to Syr. ʿezzay ḥemār (which is in turn a calque on MPers. xar-buz: see Ciancaglini, 2001, p. 127). No formal criterion helps us to distinguish a casual from an unadapted loanword. Therefore, if we analyze the Iranian borrowings into Syriac from a sociolinguistic point of view, we should in theory be able to exclude casuals from the number of genuine Iranian borrowings. However, casuals can be remarkably important to Iranists, since they often attest Middle Persian words otherwise attested only in New Persian or not attested at all elsewhere.
Iranian loanwords in Syriac belong to several different semantic fields. Official titles connected with the state administration, or the army, are in general old borrowings dating back to the Achaemenid, Arsacid, or Sasanian period (see Greenfield, 1987, p. 258; Khurshudian, 1998, p. 319). Examples: hzrpt “chiliarch,” MPers. hazārbed, Parth. hzrwpt; hrmdrʾ “commander, ruler,” MPers. framadār (for quantity of the second /a/, see Skjærvø, 2001, p. 288); mrzbnʾ “margrave,” MPers. marzbān; nwhdrʾ “army commander,” Parth. naxwaδār; pṭḥšʾ, pṭkš, ʾpṭḥšʾ, ʾpṭkš’ OIr. *dvitĭya- xšaya-, MPers. bīdaxš, lit. “the second (after the) king”; pṣgrybʾ, bṣgrybʾ MIr. *pačāγrīw or *pašāγrīw, lit. “behind, instead of the self” (for the historical value of the last two titles, see Khurshudian, 1998, pp. 19-53 and 184-92); dḥšʾ “chief guard,” cf. Parth. *daxšpat, Arm. LW dahič, dahčapet; dhqnʾ, dyhqnʾ “chief, or magistrate, of a village,” MPers. dehgān (see DEHQĀN). Other military terms are, for example, gynʾbspr MPers. gyān-abespār “reckless, devoted”; pygʾ MPers. payg “foot-soldier, courier”; ʾswrʾ MPers. aswār “horseman, rider”; ʾsph, MPers. spāh “army”; ʾsphbyd, sphbyd, MPers. spāhbed “general, commander”; zrdʾ, zry, MPers. zrēh “armor”; nyzkʾ MPers. nēzag “lance”; qṭrq’, qṭyrqʾ MPers. kantigr “quiver.”
A group of loanwords is concerned with the administration of the law. Examples: dtʾ OPers. *dāta-, MPers. dād “law, justice”; bhdʾdstnyh MPers. weh-dādestānīh “preferential right”; byhnmg “letter of rebuke”; MPers. *weh-nāmag; dwdgslryh MPers. dudag sālārīh “guardianship of a family”; pwrššnmg, MPers. pursišn nāmag “record of investigation”; psnd, MPers. passand “lenity, reduction of what the law formally prescribes”; dstbyrʾ “bill of divorce” (cf. MPers. dastwar “authority”; Shaked, 1985, p. 513).
A conspicuous group of loanwords is connected with religion. Examples: bwrsmʾ, the bunch of twigs used in the Yasna ceremony MPers. barsom; dyn, dʾyn “religion,” OPers. *dainā-, MPers. dēn; dynyg “religious,” MPers. dēnīg; drwn consecrated bread and the ceremony in which it is used, MPers. drōn; yzd “god,” MPers. yazd; kwdy “lord,” MPers. xwadāy; kwṭwdwtyh “kin marriage,” cf. MPers. xwēdōdah (see FAMILY LAW); mgwšʾ “Magian,” OPers. maguš; mwbd, mwhpṭʾ, cf. MPers. mowbed “chief of the Magians”; ʾbstg, ʾbstgʾ, ʾbstʾ “Avesta”, MPers. abestāg; nsk, a section of Avesta, MPers. nask; kwstyg “sacred girdle,” MPers. kustīg.
Syriac also preserves a great number of Iranian words relating to medicine, botany, and pharmacopoeia, many of them not attested in Middle Persian literature (see, on this matter, Gignoux, 1998 and 1998-99). Examples: ʾmlg “myrobalan,” MPers. *āmalag, NPers. āmula; blylqʾ “belleric myrobalan,” MPers. balīlag; hlylqʾ “myrobalan,” MPers. halīlag; bnpšg, bnwšg “violet,” MPers. wanafšag; gzmzg “fruit of the tamarisk-tree,” cf. NPers. gazmāzak; gyldrwg “fern,” MPers. *gīldārūg, NPers. gīl-dārū, the name of a certain medicinal wood (F. Steingass, Persian-English Dictionary, repr., Beirut, 1975, p. 1109); grmdng, a kind of remedy, MPers. *garmdānag; drstbd “chief physician,” MPers. drustabed; drṣyny “cinnamon,” NPers. dār-čīnī (q.v.); dhmst “laurel,” NPers. dahmast; zrdʾlwg “apricot,” MPers. zardālūg; ysmʾ “jasmine,” MPers. yāsaman; kyrwg “ox-eye, mallow-flower,” MPers. *xīrūg; mrdgš, mrdygwš, mrzgwš “marjoram,” MPers. marzangōš; mrdzwbg “asparagus,” MPers. *mˊārčōbag; ʾngbdyn, ʾnbgyn “honey”, MPers. angubēn; ṭrngbyn, ṭlngbyn “fresh honey,” MPers. *tarr-angubēn; škngbyn “oxymel,” MPers. *sikangubēn; ʾnʾšʾdwr, ʾnwšdwr, nšʾdr, nwšʾdr “sal ammoniac,” MPers. anōš ādur “fire antidote” (see Gignoux, 1998-99, p. 200); pyrwzʾnwš, MPers. pērōz anōš “victorious, triumphant antidote”; prʾnwš MPers. farr-anōš or purr-anōš “glorious or complete antidote”; gwgršn šhryrʾn “royal digestive,” MPers. gugārišn šahryārān.
Moreover, many Iranian loanwords are related to minerals, precious stones, and the like. Examples: ʾmbr “ambergris,” MPers. ambar; ʾlmsʾ “steel, diamond,” MPers. almās(t); blwrʾ “crystal,” MPers. bēlūr; dhng “malachite,” MPers. *dahanag, NPers. dahana; zywg “mercury, quicksilver,” MPers. *zīwag, NPers. žīwa; lʾzwrd “lapis lazuli,” cf. NPers. lāžuward; mrdkʾ, mwrdkʾ, mrdsng “litharge, lead protoxide,” MPers. mord(e)-sang; sʾmʾ “silver,” MPers. asēm; pylstg “ivory,” MPers. *pīlastag, NPers. pīlasta; pwld, bwlʾd “steel” MPers. pōlāwad; plzʾ “bronze, brass,” MPers. brinǰ; pyrwzg “sapphire,” cf. NPers. pīrōza “turquoise.”
C. A. Ciancaglini, “The Syriac Version of The Alexander Romance,” Le Muséon 114, 2001, pp. 121-40.
Idem, “Iranian Loanwords in Syriac: Some Problems in Chronology and Cultural History,” in G. C. Cereti and M. Maggi, eds., Middle Iranian Lexicography. Proceedings of the Conference held in Rome, 9-11 April 2001, Roma, 2005, pp. 253-76.
M. L. Folmer, The Aramaic Language in the Achaemenid Period, Leuven, 1995.
Ph. Gignoux, “Le traité syriaque anonyme sur les médications,” in VII Symposium Syriacum, Orientalia Christiana Analecta 256, Roma, 1998, pp. 725-33.
Idem, “On the Syriac Pharmacopoeia,” The Harp. A Review of Syriac and Oriental Ecumenical Studies, 11-12, 1998-99, pp. 193-201.
J. C. Greenfield, “Iranian Loanwords in Early Aramaic,” in EIr. II, 1987, pp. 256-59.
W. Hinz, Altiranisches Sprachgut der Nebenüberlieferungen, Wiesbaden, 1975.
E. Khurshudian, Die Parthischen und Sasanidischen Verwaltungsinstitutionen, Jerewan [Yerevan], 1998.
P. de Lagarde, Persische, armenische und indische Wörter im Syrischen (Figure 1), in Idem, Gesammelte Abhandlungen, Leipzig, 1866, pp. 1-84 (repr., Osnabrück, 1966).
A. Lemaire, “Une inscription araméenne du VIIIe siècle av. J.-C. trouvée à Bukân (Azerbaijan iranien),” Studia Iranica 27, 1998, pp. 15-30.
A. Lemaire, “L’inscription araméenne de Bukân et son intérêt historique,” Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Inscriptions 1998, pp. 293-99.
M. Maggi, “New Persian glosses in East Syriac Texts of the Eighth to Tenth Centuries,” in L. Paul, ed., Persian Origins: Early Judaeo-Persian and the Emergence of New Persian.Collected Papers of the Symposium, Göttingen, 1999, Wiesbaden, 2003, pp. 111-45.
M. Mancini, “Su alcuni riflessi del persiano antico *ganza- «tesoro»,” in idem, Note iraniche, Roma, 1987, pp. 9-60.
F. Rosenthal, “Aramaic,” in EIr. II, 1987, pp. 251-56.
Sh. Shaked, “Bagdana, King of the Demons, and other Iranian Terms in Babylonian Aramaic Magic,” in Papers in Honour of Prof. Mary Boyce II, Acta Iranica 25, Leiden, 1985, pp. 511-25.
Idem, “Iranian Loanwords in Middle Aramaic,” in EIr. II, 1987, pp. 259-61.
Idem,“A Persian House of Study, A King’s Secretary: Irano-Aramaic notes,” Acta Or. Acad. Scient. Hung. 48, 1995, pp. 171-86.
H. H. Schöffler, Die Akademie von Gondishapur. Aristoteles auf dem Wege in den Orient, Stuttgart, 1980.
P. O. Skjærvø, review of Ph. Huyse, Die dreisprachige Inschrift Šābuhrs I. an der Ka’ba-i Zardušt (ŠKZ), Corpus Inscriptionum Iranicarum, Pt. iii, Vol. i, t. i, London, 1999, 2 vols., in Orientalistische Literaturzeitung 96/2, 2001, pp. 286-88.
S. Telegdi, “Essai sur la phonétique des emprunts iraniens en araméen talmudique,” Journal Asiatique 226, 1935, pp. 177-256.
G. Widengren. Iranisch-semitische Kulturbegegnung in parthischer Zeit, Köln and Opladen, 1960.
May 22, 2006
(Claudia A. Ciancaglini)
Originally Published: November 15, 2006
Last Updated: November 15, 2006