Skip to main content

MĀZAN

MĀZAN, term for a giant demon in Avestan and Middle Persian texts.

The Avestan term māzainiia- from *māzana- (<maz-, AirWb., col. 1156, “gigantic; monster”; MPers. m ā̆ zan-māzanīg, māzandar; MMPers. mzn; Sogd. mznyʾn δyw ‘Mazanya demons’; Skr. mājaṃda-) indicates a hostile land known to Iranians in their legendary period and the dwelling place of a class of demonic beings.

In the Avesta and Middle Persian texts, the hero Haošiiaŋha (MPers. Hōšang) and the deity Sraōša (MPers. Srōš) were designated to constrain these demons. Haošiiaŋha implored various deities to grant him the support he needed in order to conquer māzainiia demons (Yašt 5.22; 9.4; 13.137; 15.8; 17.25; 19.26; Dēnkard 7.1.18; Madan II, p. 594; Mēnōg Xrad 26.20). He succeeded in destroying two-thirds of them (Dēnkard 3.26.20), while Sraōša fights them every day and night (Yašt 11.12; Bundahišn 26.52).

The Middle Persian books supplement the Avesta’s depiction of māzainiia-: they were giant sized creatures who looked like humans, save for the fact that they were so tall that the waters of the ocean Frāxkard reached only up to their mid-thigh, some up to the navel, and in the deepest place, it reached their mouth (Dēnkard 9.21.17-18; Madan, II, p. 813; Bundahišn 14.36); they were also loudmouthed and violent (Zādspram 2.11).  Whenever they came to Xwanirah (Av. Xᵛaniraθa-), the central continent where the Iranian Expanse is located (see CLIME, they caused grievous damage and much carnage. After one of their attacks, people went to the king-hero Frēdōn (see FERĒDŪN to complain that ever since he had defeated and captured Aži Dahāg (see AŽDAHĀ), fettering him to Mount Damāvand , no one had protected the region from the māzandars (Dēnkard 9.21.18-19; Madan, II, p. 813). Their grievance prompted Frēdōn to gather an army to fight these demons. At first, the māzandars thought lightly of Frēdōn and dismissed him in a derisory tone: “You struck Aži Dahāg, who was the swiftest in existence, who was the king of both demons and humans. But it was Ohrmazd who made you more capable of victory than the other creatures in order to strike him. But we will settle in this place and we will dwell in it and will not let you enter here” (Dēnkard 9.21.21; Madan, II, p. 814). Nevertheless, Frēdōn fought the māzandars in the plain of Pēšānseh. During the battle, when Frēdōn exhaled, he projected snow and ice and all the cold of winter from his right nostril and fiery stones, as large as a house in size, from his left nostril.  Frēdōn made them run up in the air and struck them and destroyed two-thirds of their towns (Dēnkard 9.21.23-24; Madan II, p. 814). Thus, he conquered the māzandars, who never again attacked the continent of Xwanirah (Dēnkard 3.26.40; Mēnōg ī Xrad 26.40) nor even contemplated the thought of entering it (Bundahišn, 29.1; Dēnkard 9.21.14-25; Madan II, pp. 812-815; Dēnkard, 7:1.25-26; Madan II, p. 596).

For the geographical location of māzainiia-, W. B. Henning proposed Varəna, the fourteenth in the list of the places and settlements in the first chapter of the Vidēvdād (Vd. 1.17) which precedes hapta həndu, Sankrit Varṇu, the ʿAornos of Alexander, the modern Buner, north of Peshawar (Henning, 1947, pp. 52-53; in the Mahāmāyūrī catalogue, Varṇu [30] stands next to the Suvāstu, the Swat, the Sindhu [the Indus], and very close to Gāndhāra, see Lévi, pp. 71-73).

These demons are also cited in some Middle Persian texts that cover the ritual disposal of trimmed hair and nails, since if they are not properly disposed of, they could serve as weapons and implements in their (māzanīgān dēwān) hands (Pahlavi Widēwdād, 17.9-10; Zand ī Fragard ī Jud-Dēw-Dād 35.5; Šāyest nē šāyest 12.6; Ṣaddar Nasr 14; The Persian Rivāyats, pp. 248-50).

In Manichean Middle Persian texts, the term mazan often appears side by side with āsrēštār, and usually in plural form, mazanān and āsrēštārān. Both terms usually denote the demonic abortions which fell on earth and became instrumental in the creation of Adam and Eve by their leaders, Ašqalūn, a male demon, and Nebrōʾel, a female one, the procreators of the first human couple (Andreas and Henning, p. 195 /R/i/26-27; see MANICHEISM iii. THE MANICHEAN PANDÆMONIUM).

According to the apologetic text Škand Gumānīg Wizār (Doubt-dispelling exposition), in Manichean parlance the Middle Persian term māzendar(ān) meant the demons fettered in the skies (chap. 16.14; 16.28-36; ed. de Menasce, pp. 252-55). This is confirmed by Manichean Middle Persian fragment M 2157: its headline ʾbr mʾzynd(r)ʾ(n) “About the māzendar” can be deciphered as also the name of Narsahyazad (nryshyzd), the Third Messenger, who is well known as one aspect of the divine beauty which seduced the male and female archons in the skies, just as the māzandarān are seduced by the twelve daughters of Zurvan as described in Škand Gumānīg Wizār. The Manichean “term māzendar could indeed be used to designate different categories of demons imprisoned in the skies, the lustful archons on the one hand, and the lustful watchers on the other” (Sundermann, p. 42; see COSMOGONY AND COSMOLOGY iii. IN MANICHEISM).

The term Māzandarān appears in two separate episodes set in the Šāh-nāma: In the first, the hero Sām (see KARSĀSP), under Manučihr’s order, organized a military campaign against Māzandarān and Gurgsārān; in Māzandarān he fought with demons and defeated them (I, line 224, p. 179). In the second narrative, Kay Kāwus (see KAYĀNIĀN v.), spellbound by a demon disguised as a minstrel from Māzandarān, leads an army against that land. The king of Māzandarān seeks help from Div-e Safid (the White Demon), and with the demon’s magic, Kāwus loses his sight, and he and his companions are trapped. (II, lines 11-222).

The description of Div-e Safid in the Šāh-nāma is very close to the physical description of the māzandars in the Zoroastrian sources – his enormous size is described in the fifth ḵᵛan (see HAFT ḴᵛĀN) as like a mountain “with shoulders, breast, and neck ten cords across”- (II, line 479, p. 36). Div-e Safid is unknown from Zoroastrian tradition, but the story suggests the poet’s familiarity with ancient Iranian myths, the extreme hostility of Iranians towards demons, and a reflection of earlier events related in the Avesta and Middle Persian texts that are reshaped in the Šāh-nāma.

Bibliography

F. C. Andreas and W. Henning,”Mitteliranische Manichaica aus Chinesisch-Turkestan,” Part I, SPAW, Phil.-hist. Kl., Berlin, 1932, pp. 175-222; repr. in W. B. Henning Selected Papers I, Acta Iranica 5, Leiden and Tehran, 1977, pp. 1-48.

T. Burrow, “The Proto-Indoaryans,” The Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2, 1973, pp. 123-40.

A. Christensen, Essai sur la démonologie Iranienne, Copenhagen, 1941.

J. Darmesteter, Le Zend-Avesta 3 vols., Paris, 1960.

B. N. Dhabhar, The Persian Rivayats of Hormazyar Framarz and Others, Bombay, 1932.

Abu’l-Qāsem Ferdowsi, Šāh-nāma, eds. Djalal Khaleghi-Motlagh et al., 12 vols. in 11, New York, 1987-2009 (8 vols. Persian text with 3 vols. commentary in Persian).

W. B. Henning, “The Book of the Giants,” BSOAS, 1943, pp. 52-74; repr. in W. B. Henning Selected Papers II, Acta Iranica 15, Leiden, 1977, pp. 115-37.

Idem, “Two Manichaean Magical Texts with an Excursus on the Parthian Ending ‑ēndēh,” BSOAS, 1947, pp. 39-66; repr. W. B. Henning Selected Papers, II, Acta Iranica 15, Leiden and Tehran, 1977, pp. 273-300.

F. M. P. Kotwal, The Supplementary Texts to the Šāyest Nē-Šayest, Copenhagen, 1969.

S. Lévi, “Le catalogue géographique des Yakṣa dans la Mahāmāyūrī,” Journal Asiatique 11, 1915, pp. 19-138.

F. Pakzad, Bundahišn. Zoroastrische Kosmogonie Und Kosmologie. Band I: Kritische Edition, Ancient Iranian Studies 2, Tehran, 2005.

D. M. Madan, The Complete Text of the Pahlavi Dinkard (Dēnkard), 2 vols., Bombay, 1911.

J. de Menasce, Škand-gumānīk vičār. La solution décisive des doutes: texte pazand-pehlevi, Fribourg, 1945.

M. Moazami, Wrestling with the Demons of the Pahlavi Widēwdād: Transcription, Translation, and Commentary, Leiden and Boston, 2014.

Idem, Laws of Ritual Purity: Zand ī Fragard ī Jud-Dēw-Dād, Leiden and Boston, 2021.

M. Molé, “La guerre des géants d’après le ‘Sūtkar Nask’,” Indo-Iranian Journal 3/4 1959, pp. 282-305.

P. O. Skjærvø, “Iranian Epic and the Manichean Book of Giants. Irano-Manichaica III,” in Eva Jeremias, ed., Zsigismond Telegdi Memorial VolumeAOASH 48/1-2, Budapest, 1995 [pub. 1997], pp. pp. 187-223.

W. Sundermann, “Mani’s ‘Book of the Giants’ and the Jewish Books of Enoch: A Case of Terminological Difference and What it Implies,” in Sh. Shaked and A. Netzer, eds., Irano-Judaica: Studies Relating to the Jewish Contacts with Persian Culture throughout the Ages III, Jerusalem, 1994, pp. 40-48.

A. Tafażżoli, Mēnōg ī Xrad, Tehran, 1985.

J. C. Tavadia, Šāyast-nē-šāyast : A Pahlavi Text on Religious Customs, Hamburg, 1930.

E. Yarshater, “Iranian National History,” in The Cambridge History of Iran vol. 3(1), Cambridge, 1983, pp. 359-477.

 

Cite this article

Moazami, Mahnaz. "MĀZAN." Encyclopaedia Iranica. Published March 16, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1163/2330-4804_EIRO_COM_366432