KHALESI, MAHDI

 

KHALESI, MAHDI

KHALESI (Ḵāleṣi), MAHDI b. Ḥosayn Kāẓemi (مَهدی خالصی, b. Karḵ, Iraq, ca. 1276/1860; d. Mashhad, 12 Ramażān 1343/6 April 1925), a leading, outspoken, Kāẓemayn-based Shiʿite jurist, whose close involvement in anti-British politics and opposition to British occupation in Iraq resulted in his exile to Iran. 

Born in the Shiʿite quarter of Karḵ near Kāẓemayn in 1859-60 or 1861 to a family of scholars that hailed originally from Ḵāleṣ (east of Baghdad), Khalesi was initially educated by his father, Ḥosayn Kāẓemi (d. 1894-95), and by Shaikh ʿAbbās Jaṣṣāni (d. 1888-89) before moving to the Shiʿite shrine cities (ʿatabāt).  Although an Arab, Khalesi, like many other Shiʿite clerics residing at the time in Iraq, held Persian nationality (Allawi, p. 420; cf. Khadim, p. 194).  In the Shiʿite shrine cities, Khalesi studied with some of the most renowned Shiʿite scholars of the age, including Mirzā Ḥabib-Allāh Rašti (1819-95), a leading mojtahed; Mirzā Moḥammad-Ḥasan Širāzi (1814-95), known as Mirzā-ye Širāzi and widely recognized as the supreme marjaʿ al-taqlid (model of emulation) of the time, and Āḵund Mollā Kāẓem Ḵorāsāni (1839-1911), a leading proponent of the Persian Constitutional Revolution.  After Širāzi’s death, Khalesi returned to Kāẓemayn and established a religious school called Madrasat al-Zahrāʾ, which counted among its students Moḥammad-Fāżel Jamāli (d. 1997), the future prime minister of Iraq (1953-54), and the renowned bibliophile Šehāb-al-Din Marʿaši Najafi (d. 1990).  The school was discontinued after Khalesi’s death (Kāẓemi, p. 273; cf. Ṣāleḥi, p. 37) but was later resurrected by his son, Moḥammad b. Moḥammad-Mahdi Khalesi, known as Khalesizada (Ḵāleṣizāda; d. 1963), and transformed into an active religious institute known as Jāmeʿat madinat al-ʿelm (Brunner, pp. 272-73; Ende, 2007, p. 232).  Khalesi soon became the head of the Shiʿite community in Kāẓemayn and an influential marjaʿ al-taqlid (Sobḥāni, XIV, p. 849).  In Kāẓemayn, he openly opposed the Bahāʾi religion and joined religious scholars (ulema) of Najaf in issuing a fatwa boycotting (ḥokm-e taḥrim) the newspaper Lesān-al-ʿArab for publishing articles in support of the nascent Iraqi Bahāʾi community (Farāhāni, I, p. 559).   

Khalesi commenced his political activities in late 1911 by joining a number of fellow-marājeʿ and lower-ranking clerics in Iraq in issuing fatwas for jihad against the Russian incursions in Iran and the Italian invasion of Libya.  Three years later, soon after the outset of World War I, he joined other religious scholars in calling for jihad against the British in southern Iraq (Aṣḡari-nežād, p. 501; Rajabi, pp. 185, 387; Ende, 1981, pp. 66-67).  In late November 1914, together with his son Khalesizada, Khalesi traveled from Kāẓemayn to the southeastern Iraqi town of ʿAmāra and instigated believers gathered at the main mosque with a fiery sermon to consider it their religious duty to join Ottoman troops in fighting the British and, if necessary, sacrifice their lives in the path of jihad.  Khalesi and his son fought British forces in the small southern Iraqi village of Qorna.  The British summarily crushed the Iraqi fighters and forced them to retreat (Khalesi; Ḥasan Amin, II, p. 334).  Khalesi and his son both survived the battle.

At the conclusion of World War I, Great Britain occupied Iraq as sanctioned by the League of Nations Mandate for Mesopotamia.  Khalesi soon participated in clandestine meetings organized by Moḥammad-Taqi Širāzi (known as Mirzā-ye Dovvom, d. 1920) to plot against the British occupation (Baḵšāyeši, p. 385).  When Širāzi issued a fatwa in summer 1920 permitting the use of force to fight the British, Khalesi was among the first religious scholars to support the call for jihad and participated in the Iraqi revolt against the British that came to be known as the Great Iraqi Revolution of 1920 (Khadim, pp. 54-55).  Thousands of Iraqis were killed as the British once again crushed the revolt in fall 1920.  Khalesi subsequently returned to Kāẓemayn and continued his political opposition from the pulpit, warning followers about the dangers of the British intrusion in Iraq.  He also joined other scholars (mojtahed) in Iraq in opposing the Wahhābi attacks on southern Iraq in the early 1920s.

Following the failure of the revolution, the British established the Hashemite monarchy, nominated Fayṣal as the king of Iraq in 1921, instituted an Anglo-Iraqi Treaty to replace the British Mandate, and called for parliamentary elections.  Khalesi, who had previously expressed qualified allegiance (bayʿa) to Fayṣal (Allawi, p. 375), rejected the Treaty and declared in 1922 that anyone who supported the elections was an enemy of God (Wardi, VI, p. 202; Kedourie, p. 150; Khadim, p. 155; Allawi, p. 417).  The supreme marjaʿ in Najaf, Abu’l-Ḥasan Eṣfahāni (d. 1946), together with Moḥammad-Ḥosayni Nāʾini (d. 1936), appear at first to have resisted issuing a fatwa against participating in the elections but were eventually convinced by the more firebrand Khalesi.  Khalesi and other scholars in Kāẓemayn then added their seals to the fatwa (Hairi, p. 130; Sluglett, p. 56; Baḵšāyeši, pp. 410, 430; Tripp, p. 36; Luizard, pp. 225-28; Zubaida, pp. 211-12; Allawi, p. 412).  The same year, Khalesi, Eṣfahāni, and Nāʾini organized a massive protest demonstration in Karbala against the Treaty, attended by some 300,000 Iraqis and more than 2,500 tribal chiefs, who made a pact to stand against any forms of foreign intrusion (Hairi, p. 129; cf. Allawi, pp. 389-91). 

As a consequence of his overt and subversive political and military activities, King Fayṣal was pressured by the British High Commissioner to order the Iraqi police to arrest Khalesi, who was viewed as the chief obstructionist among the Shiʿite ulema.  In early summer 1923, British forces banished Khalesi’s son to Iran and, soon after, deported Khalesi to the Ḥejāz (Kedouri, p. 150; Rajabi, p. 186; Khadim, pp. 157-58).  Most of the clerics in Iraq objected to his exile in vain.  After performing the pilgrimage to Mecca, he was invited to settle in Iran, where he is said to have received a hero’s welcome (Baḵšāyeši, p. 410; Allawi, p. 422); he enjoyed his stays in Bushehr, Isfahan, and Qom (Modarres, II, p. 117).  While in Qom, he met with Eṣfahāni and Nāʾini, who had left Iraq in protest Khalesi’s exile (Aṣḡari-nežād, p. 509; Rajabi, p. 187); however, when Eṣfahāni and Nāʾini returned to Iraq in spring 1924, Khalesi chose to remain in Iran and criticized them for negotiating with the Iraqi government and acquiescing to Fayṣal’s demand on avoiding political activism (Kedourie, p. 151). 

To voice his disagreement with his fellow senior clerics, he left Qom and moved to Mashhad.  Other sources indicate that the Iranian government ordered him to move to Mashhad, after European newspapers accused him of instigating the murder of the American consul Robert Imbrie, in which his son Khalesizada was implicated and for which he was arrested (Ḥosayni Āheq, p. 735, citing Moḥammad Qazvini’s Wafayāt-e moʿāṣerin; Aḥmadi, p. 55).  He engaged in teaching and continued his political activities through founding the short-lived organization, Jamʿiyat esteḵlāṣ al-ḥaramayn al-šarifayn wa-bayn al-nahrayn (The Society for the Liberation of Mecca, Medina, and Mesopotamia).  It appears that he also played a role in instigating attacks on Bahāʾi citizens and their properties at this time (Foʾādi Bošruʾi, p. 191; Momen, pp. 150-51).  Other clerics in Mashhad appear to have been displeased with certain provocative fatwas he issued and at one point publicly accused him of being a Bahāʾi in an attempt to discredit him (Aṣḡari-nežād, p. 511-12; Ḥosayni Āheq, p. 735; Foʾādi Bošruʾi, pp. 189-90; Fāżel Māzandarāni, IX,  pp. 40-41; Momen, pp. 150-51). 

Nonetheless, when he died of a heart attack in the spring of 1925 (Dehḵodā; Aṣḡari-nežād, p. 512), his death was mourned throughout Iran and Iraq, Shiʿite seminaries were closed as a sign of respect (Ṣāleḥi, p. 37), and memorial gatherings were held in his honor at mosques in Kāẓemayn and Baghdad for two successive months (Wardi, VI, pp. 251-53; Kāẓemi, p. 274).  It is reported that thousands of Shiʿite and Sunni Muslims in Iraq lamented his death with the chant, “O Pillar of Islam, Guardian of the Šariʿa / You have orphaned us, Sunni and Shiʿi” (Allawi, p. 597).  Claims made in later hagiographical sources (e.g., Dabbāḡ) that he was killed cannot be substantiated.  The general consul of the Soviet Union in Khorasan officially expressed his sympathies over the “supreme calamity” (moṣibat-e ʿoẓmā) of his death, offered condolences “especially” to Khalesi’s son, and closed all Russian entrepreneurial and financial institutions in Mashhad for two days out of respect (Ṣafāʾi, pp. 107-13).  Khalesi was survived by two sons, ʿAli, about whom little is known, and the aforementioned Khalesizada and his brother, Rāżi Khalesi (d. 1928), a prominent scholar in his own right (Amin ʿĀmeli, VI, p. 444; Rajabi, p. 387; Ḥosayni Āheq, p. 736).

Khalesi authored over a dozen works, mostly on matters of Shiʿite jurisprudence, ten of which have been published in Baghdad and Mashhad.  More significant among them are: (1) Bayān taṣḥif al-menḥa al-elāhiya ʿan al-nafṯat al-šayṭāniya, a three-volume response to an abridged Arabic translation of a Persian anti-Shiʿite polemical work by the Naqšbandi scholar, Šāh ʿAbd-al-Aziz Dehlavi (d. 1824), sarcastically entitled Ketāb al-toḥfat al-eṯnā ʿašariya (A Gift to the Twelvers) and published widely in India in the early 19th cent (Āqā Bozorg Ṭehrāni, III, p. 177);  (2) Ḥāšia ʿalā kefāyat al-oṣul, (Baghdad, 1910), a commentary on his teacher Āḵund Ḵorāsāni’s Kefāyat al-oṣul, one of the most famous and challenging works in the genre of the “roots of law” (oṣul al-feqh; Āqā Bozorg Ṭehrāni, VI, p. 188; XIV, p. 35); (3) Ketāb al-jehād, also known as al-Ḥosām al-battār fi jehād al-koffār, his main work on the theory and principles of jihad, written during the uprising against the British and serialized in the Baghdadi paper Ṣadā al-Eslām in August-September 1915; (4) Talḵiṣ al-rasāʾel le-Mortażā Anṣāri, a four-part abridgement of Shaikh Mortażā Anṣāri’s (d. 1864) treatises on oṣul al-feqh; (5) al-Šariʿa al-samḥāʾ fi aḥkām sayyed al-anbiāʾ, a collection of fatwas (Baghdad, 1920; Āqā Bozorg Ṭehrāni, IV, p. 186); and (6) al-Qawaʿed al-feqhiya, his final work, published in two volumes in 1925 about the rules and principles of Islamic jurisprudence (Āqā Bozorg Ṭehrāni, XVII, p. 188).

It has been suggested that, at a time when the future of Iraq was being decided, Khalesi’s miscalculations adversely affected the fortunes of Iraqi Shiʿites for decades to come (Kedourie, p. 136).  After Khalesi’s exile, political opposition from the Shiʿite ulema of Iraq went into abeyance until the 1960s.  As for Khalesi’s impact on the politicization of twentieth century Iranian Shiʿism, it can be traced principally through the influence he exerted on his son Khalesizada.  The latter not only sought to emulate his father in serving as one of the most politically active Shiʿite clerics in Iran during the 1920s, but he also openly advocated the establishment of an Islamic government as early as 1938 (Ṣafāʾi, p. 108).

Bibliography:

Primary sources.

Moḥammad-Mahdi Khalesi, al-Ḥosām al-battār fi jehād al-koffār, Baghdad, 1915, available online at http://www.khalesy.com/index.php/ar/29-الحسام-البتّار-في-جهاد-الكفّار (accessed on 20 January 2015). 

Moḥammad Khalesizada, Article without title about his father’s role in the struggle against British colonialism, in Resālat al-Eslām, Cairo, no. 6, 1954, pp. 51-60.

Idem, La vie de l’ayatollah Mahdî al-Khâlisî par son fils, tr. Pierre-Jean Luizard, Paris, 2005.

Studies

ʿAli Aḥmadi, Šayḵ Moḥammad Ḵāleṣizāda: Ruḥāniyat dar maṣāff bā Engelīs, Tehran, 2004 ; tr. Moḥammad Nur-al-Din ʿAbd-al-Monʿem as Āyatallāh al-Šayḵ Moḥammad al-Ḵāleṣi: Ṣerāʿ al-moʾassasa al-diniyya maʿa’l-Enjliz, Cairo, 2008.

Ali A. Allawi, Faisal I of Iraq, New Haven, 2014. 

Sayyed Moḥsen Amin ʿĀmeli, Aʿyān al-šiʿa, Beirut, 1983, 11 vols., X, pp. 157-58. 

Ḥasan Amin, Mostadrakāt aʿyān al-šiʿa, 2 vols., Beirut, 1997. 

Moḥammad-Hādi Amini, Moʿjam rejāl al-fekr wa’l-adab fi’l-Najaf ḵelāl alf ʿām, [Najaf?], 1992, 3 vols., II, pp. 475-76. 

Āqā Bozorg Ṭehrāni, al-Ḏariʿa elā taṣānif al-šiʿa, 26 vols., Beirut, 1983-86.

Moḥammad Aṣḡari-nežād, “Moḥammad-Mahdi Ḵāleṣi motawaffā-ye 1304 Š,” in Golšan-e abrār: Ḵolāṣa-i az zendagi-e osvahā-ye ʿelm wa ʿamal, 3 vols, Qom, 2003, I, pp. 499-512.

Kurkis ʿAwwād, Moʿjam al-moʾallefin al-ʿerāqiyin fi’l-qarnayn al-tāseʿ ʿašar wa’l-ʿešrin, 1800-1969, Baghdad, 1969, 3 vols., III, p. 250. 

ʿAqiqi Baḵšāyeši, Foqahā-ye nāmdār-e Šiʿa, Qom, 1985. 

Rainer Brunner, Islamic Ecumenism in the 20th Century: The Azhar and Shiism between Rapprochement and Restraint, Leiden, 2004. 

Werner Ende, “Iraq in World War I: The Turks, the Germans and the Shiʿite Mujtahids’ call for Jihād,” in Rudolph Peters, ed., Proceedings of the Ninth Congress of the Union Européenne des Arabisants et Islamisants, Amsterdam, 1st to 7th September 1978, Leiden, 1981, pp. 57-71. 

Idem, “Success and Failure of a Shiite Modernist: Muhammad ibn Muhammad Mahdi al-Khalisi (1890-1963),” tr. Patrick Camiller, in Alessandro Monsutti, Silvia Naef, and Farian Sabahi, eds., The Other Shiites: From the Mediterranean to Central Asia, Bern and New York, 2007, pp. 231-44. 

Ḥasan Farāhāni, “Engelis wa jonbeš-e esteqlāl-ṭalabi-e šiʿayān-e ʿErāq (1914-1924),” Faṣl-nāma-ye moṭālaʿāt-e tāriḵi 9, Fall 2005, pp. 178-241. 

Idem, Ruzšemār-e tāriḵ-e moʿāṣer-e Irān, 2 vols., Tehran, 2006. 

Fāżel Māzandarāni, Tāriḵ-e ẓohur al-ḥaqq, 9 vols., manuscript in private hands. 

Ḥasan Foʾādi Bošruʾi, Tāriḵ-e diānat-e Bahāʾi dar Ḵorāsān, eds. Minudoḵt Foʾādi and Faridun Vahman, Darmstadt, 2007.

ʿAbd-al-Karim Ḥaʾeri Yazdi, Dorar al-foʾād, 2 vols., Qom, n.d.

Abdul-Hadi Hairi, Shīʿīsm and Constitutionalism in Iran: A Study of the Role Played by the Persian Residents of Iraq in Iranian Politics, Leiden, 1977; Pers. version: Tašayyoʿ wa mašruṭiyat dar Irān wa naqš-e irāniān-e moqim-e ʿErāq, Tehran, 1985. 

Zahrā Ḥosayni Āheq, “Ḵāleṣi,” in Ḡolām-ʿAli A. Ḥaddād ʿĀdel, ed., Dāneš-nāma-ye jahān-e Eslām XIV, Tehran, 2010, pp. 734-37. 

Mahdi Jalāli, Fehrest al-torāṯ , 2 vols., Qom, 2001, pp. 298-99. 

Moḥammad-Mahdi Musawi Kāẓemi, Aḥsan al-wadiʿa fi tarājem mašāhir mojtahedi al-Šiʿa, 2 vols. in 1, Najaf, 1968, pp. 271-74. 

Elie Kedourie, “The Iraqi Shiʿis and Their Fate,” in Martin S. Kramer, ed., Shiʿism, Resistance, and Revolution, Boulder, 1987, pp. 135-57. 

ʿAli Ḵiābāni, Ketāb-e ʿolamāʾ-e moʿāṣerin, Tehran, 1947, pp. 134-36.  Abbas K. Khadim, Reclaiming Iraq: The 1920 Revolution and the Founding of the Modern State, Austin, 2012. 

Pierre-Jean Luizard, “Shaykh Muḥammad al-Khāliṣī (1890-1963) and His Political Role in Iraq and Iran in the 1910s/20s,” in Rainer Brunner and Werner Ende, eds., The Twelver Shia in Modern Times: Religious Culture and Political History, Social, Economic and Political Studies of the Middle East and Asia 72, Leiden, 2001, pp. 223-35.

Moḥammad-ʿAli Modarres, Rayḥānat al-adab fi tarājem al-maʿrufin be’l-konya wa’l-laqab, 8 vols., Tehran, 1995-96, II, pp. 116-17. 

Moojan Momen, The Bahaʾi Communities of Iran, 1851-1921 I: The North of Iran, Oxford, 2015. 

Yitzhak Nakash, The Shiʿis of Iraq, Princeton, 1994, pp. 75 ff. 

Moḥammad-Ḥasan Rajabi, ʿOlamā-ye mojāhed, Tehran, 2003, pp. 185-87. 

Moḥammad Šarif Rāzi, Ganjina-ye dānešmandān, 7 vols., Tehran, 1973-, I, pp. 229-31.

Ebrāhim Ṣafāʾi, Panjāh ḵāṭera az panjāh sāl, Tehran, 1992. 

Šahidi Ṣāleḥi, “Ḵāleṣi,” in Aḥmad Ḥājj Sayyed Jawādi, Kāmrān Fāni, and Bahāʾ-al-Din Ḵorramšāhi, eds., Dāʾerat al-maʿāref-e tašayyoʿ VII, 1999, pp. 36-37. 

Peter Sluglett, Britain in Iraq: Contriving King and Country, 1914-1932, New York, 2007.

Jaʿfar Sobḥāni, Mawsuʿat ṭabaqāt al-foqahāʾ, 15 vols, Qom, 1997, XIV/2, pp. 848-50. 

[M. al-Ṭorayḥi], “Al-Mojāhed al-kabir al-Šayḵ Moḥammad-Mahdi al-Ḵāleṣi,” al-Mawsem 3, 1990, pp. 728-59. 

Charles Tripp, A History of Iraq, Cambridge and New York, 2000. 

ʿAli Wardi, Lamaḥāt ejtemāʿiya men taʾriḵ al-ʿErāq al-ḥadiṯ, 6 vols., Baghdad, 1976-79.

Joyce N. Wiley, The Islamic Movement of Iraqi Shiʿas, Boulder, Colo., 1992. 

Ḵayr-al-Din Zerekli, al-Aʿlām: Qāmus tarājem al-ašhar al-rejāl wa’l-nesāʾ …,  8 vols., Beirut, 1980, VII, p. 115. 

Sami Zubaida, “The Fragments Imagine the Nation: The Case of Iraq,” IJMES 34, 2002, 205-15.

Sources online. 

E. Dabbāḡ, “Ḵāleṣtarin ruzhā-ye mobāraza: Zendagi-nāma-ye Ayatollah al-ʿOẓmā Šahid Moḥammad Mahdī Ḵāleṣi,” at http://www.khalesy.com/index.php/fa/30-نماز-جمعه-آيت-الله-خالصي-زاده-در-شهرري-به-روايت-أسناد-محرمانه (accessed 20 January 2015).

ʿAli-Akbar Dehḵodā, Loḡat-nama, s.v. “Mahdi Ḵāleṣi,” at http://www.loghatnaameh.org/dehkhodaworddetail-ba5ad41dd7ad40efafd3ecdb873f2170-fa.html (accessed 20 January 2015).

(Omid Ghaemmaghami, and Mina Yazdani)

Originally Published: March 4, 2016

Last Updated: March 4, 2016

Cite this entry:

Omid Ghaemmaghami, and Mina Yazdani, “KHALESI, MAHDI,” Encyclopædia Iranicaonline edition, 2016, available at http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/khalesi-mahdi (accessed on 04 March 2016).