ĀL-E ELYĀS

 

ĀL-E ELYĀS, a short-lived Iranian dynasty which ruled in the eastern Persian province of Kermān during the 4th/10th century. The founder of the family’s fortunes, Abū ʿAlī Moḥammad b. Elyās, was apparently of Sogdian origin; the family always retained estates in Soḡd. He started his career in the army of the Samanid amir Naṣr II b. Aḥmad (301-31/914-43). He is first mentioned as being jailed by the amir in Bokhara for some misdeed; but he was released on the intercession of the vizier, Abu’l-Fażl Moḥammad Baḷʿamī (317/929). It is possible that he had been involved in the rebellion against Naṣr b. Aḥmad by his three brothers. After his liberation, Moḥammad b. Elyās certainly proclaimed his adherence to the cause of one of these brothers, Yaḥyā, when he subsequently found himself in temporary control of Nīšāpūr. But Naṣr b. Aḥmad’s reassertion of authority in his kingdom in 320/932 drove Moḥammad b. Elyās south into Kermān (Gardīzī, ed. Nazim, pp. 29-30; Naršaḵī, Tārīḵ-eBoḵārā, tr. R. N. Frye, The History of Bukhara, Cambridge, Mass., 1954, pp. 95-96).

The province of Kermān had, in the second half of the 3rd/9th century, formed part of the vast but ephemeral military empire of the Saffarid brothers Yaʿqūb and ʿAmr b. Layṯ. After 301/913-14 the ʿAbbasid caliphs had fleetingly been able to reimpose their authority in Fārs and Kermān, with Moqtader’s slave commander Yāqūt acting as governor there from 315/927 onwards. However, the rise of the Daylamī adventurer Mardāvīǰ b. Zīār and, in his train, the three Buyid brothers ʿAlī (the later ʿEmād-al-dawla), Ḥasan (the later Rokn-al-dawla) and Aḥmad (the later Moʿezz-al-dawla) removed southern Persia from direct caliphal control forever; in 322/934 Yāqūt lost his capital, Shiraz, to the Buyids. In this power vacuum, Moḥammad b. Elyās appeared and established himself as independent ruler in Kermān, but was driven out by the Samanid general Mākān b. Kākī (322/934). A three-cornered struggle now took place in Kermān between the representative of Samanid authority in Kermān, Abū ʿAlī Ebrāhīm b. Sīmǰūr, Moḥammad b. Elyās, and an invading force from the west under Moʿezz-al-dawla, who had been diverted thither by ʿEmād-al-dawla in Fārs. The sources record confused fighting in Kermān, in which Moḥammad b. Elyās was forced to seek refuge with the Saffarids in Sīstān. Ebrāhīm b. Sīmǰūr returned to Khorasan; and Buyid authority was at last established, but only after ʿEmād-al-dawla had been obliged to send a further army to his brother’s aid against the fierce mountain peoples of Kermān, the Kūfečīs (or Qofṣ) and the Balūč (324-25/936-37) (Ebn Meskawayh, repeated in Ebn al-Aṯīr).

For thirty years or so nothing is recorded of affairs in Kermān. But it is clear that Moḥammad b. Elyās must have returned from Sīstān at an early date and reasserted his power in Kermān. He recognized the Samanids as suzerains but was in practice an independent ruler, receiving in 348/959-60 the insignia of royalty direct from the ʿAbbasid caliph al-Moṭīʿ. To a marked degree, the Elyasid state in Kermān became a bandit one, apparently deriving revenue from the spoils of raids on caravans crossing southern Persia, in concert with the predatory Kūfečīs and Balūč, who, as the geographer Maqdesī (or Moqaddasī) records, terrorized travelers through the Great Desert (pp. 488-90). On the credit side, Moḥammad b. Elyās did much useful charitable building work in his capital, Bardasīr (the later town of Kermān), including a new mosque and citadel; he also directed construction in other towns of the province. No coins of the Elyasids were known, until in 1974 there turned up a dirham of Moḥammad b. Elyās, dated 334/945-46 and minted at “Kermān” (sc. at this time, the province, although the coin was probably struck in Bardasīr anyway; A. H. Morton, “A dirham of Muḥammad b. Ilyās of Kirmān,” Iran 15, 1977, pp. 178-82). Certainly the sources stress the prodigious treasures which Moḥammad b. Elyās is supposed to have amassed.

The events surrounding the end of Moḥammad b. Elyās’s reign of some thirty years and the downfall of his whole family are given in detail by Ebn Meskawayh (repeated in Ebn al-Aṯīr and to be supplemented by ʿOtbī) under the years 356-57/967-68. After being afflicted by a paralytic stroke, Moḥammad b. Elyās was compelled to divide his power in Kermān among his three sons Elyasaʿ, Elyās, and Solaymān; the first was commander of the army and walī-al-ʿahd (heir-presumptive). Solaymān refused to accept a subordinate role, rebelled unsuccessfully, and had to flee to Khorasan. Moḥammad b. Elyās’s arbitrary and capricious behavior now compelled Elyasaʿ to require his abdication, and the former had accordingly to leave Kermān, taking with him all his immense wealth. He settled at the court of Amir Manṣūr b. Nūḥ at Bokhara, recovered from his condition, and became one of the Samanid ruler’s boon-companions. He lived until 356/967 (ʿOtbī and Ebn al-Aṯīr) or 357/968 (Ebn Meskawayh).

The inexperienced Elyasaʿ was not long able to hold out against the vigorous and forceful ʿAżod-al-dawla, who was well on his way to uniting all the Buyid dominions under his personal rule and had conquered ʿOmān in 356/967. ʿAżod-al-dawla suborned a large part of Elyasaʿ’s Turkish and Daylamī troops; and when he invaded Kermān in 357/968, Elyasaʿ could only flee without a fight to Bokhara, eventually going on to Ḵᵛārazm, where he ultimately died. Kermān was now incorporated into the Buyid empire for the next eighty years, ʿAżod-al-dawla appointing his son Šīrzīl (the later Šaraf-al-dawla) as his deputy in the province. The sources mention futile attempts over the next few years by Elyasid claimants hoping to regain their lost patrimony from the Buyids. In 359/969-70 Solaymān b. Moḥammad b. Elyās came from Khorasan with a force of Samanid troops to raise the Kūfečīs and Balūč against the Buyids; but Solaymān was killed in battle, and ʿAżod-al-dawla’s generals then led a punitive expedition through southeastern Persia to the Makrān coast. Finally, in 364/974-75, an Elyasid called Ḥosayn, apparently a son of Moḥammad b. Elyās, joined in a rising of the mountain peoples of southern Kermān and Makrān against the Buyids when ʿAżod-al-dawla was distracted by events in Iraq and ʿOmān. He was, however, captured at Jīroft and disappears from history, together with the rest of his short-lived dynasty. Kermān, apart from a brief interlude of Ghaznavid occupation, remained firmly within the Buyid orbit until the coming of Qāvord and the Saljuqs.

Bibliography:

The principal, near-contemporary sources are Ebn Meskawayh’s Taǰāreb I-II, tr., IV-V. His information was used by Ebn al-Aṯīr, VIII, and by ʿOtbī, al-Taʾrīḵ al-Yamīnī, ed. with commentary by Manīnī, Cairo, 1286/1869, II, pp. 116-19, for the events in Kermān itself. Two centuries after the Elyasids, the local historian of Kermān, Afżal-al-dīn Aḥmad Kermānī, wrote his ʿEqd al-ʿolā, which has important details about Moḥammad b. Elyās’s rule in Kermān and especially in Bardasīr (ed. ʿA. M. ʿĀmerī Nāʾīnī, Tehran, 1311 Š./1932, pp. 60, 66-68).

This and subsequent material was used by the 19th-century historian of Kermān, Aḥmad ʿAlī Khan Wazīrī, in his Tārīḵ-eSālārīya, ed. M. E. Bāstānī Pārīzī, Tehran, 1340 Š./1961, pp. 59-63, 65-68.

These and other, minor sources are utilized in C. E. Bosworth, “The Banū Ilyās of Kirmān,” Iran and Islam, in memory of the late Vladimir Minorsky, Edinburgh, 1971, pp. 107-24.

(C. E. Bosworth)

Originally Published: December 15, 1984

Last Updated: July 29, 2011

This article is available in print.
Vol. I, Fasc. 7, pp. 754-756

Cite this entry:

C. E. Bosworth, “Al-E Elyas,” Encyclopædia Iranica, I/7, pp. 754-756; an updated version is available online at http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/al-e-elyas (accessed on 14 May 2014).